Author Topic: First Amendment -- I Mean, Chick-fil-A -- Is 0-3  (Read 297 times)

Offline Woody

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1184
  • Location: Anywhere
Ya, I've heard talking head cons whine about how this was supposedly unconstitutional.  Same guys who claim that stuff that isn't specifically named in the Constitution has no Constitutional protection.

 :hogwash: 

But free speech IS specifically named!
So what if it is? Free speech never was a corporate operation entitlement program. That's a huge non sequitur on your part.

What do you mean, "So what if it is"?  The owner of the company has First Amendment rights.  The government cannot deny the company operating permits because elected politicians disapprove of his political opinions.

Do you wish it were otherwise?

Quote
Do you wish it were otherwise?


Duh!  Of course she does.
A reminder for kentay:
I fully support going back to ALL, that says ALL THE CLINTON TAX and spend policies that led to the economic boom in the second half of the 90's.