i realize that truth is subjective, coleman. the point remains however, that dead is dead and bombing kills as many as the massacre -so what good does it do? stupid way to end a dispute or end atrocity. there is as much atrocity in bombing people as there is in killing them with a gun or knife, etc. we solve nothing doing this. except to make the rich richer. war does nothing but shift control of resources from the people in general to greedy capitalists who care not what lie they need tell to manipulate or how many they kill in pretense of defense.
There is absolutely nothing "subjective" about the truth.
You claimed that, "Uncontroversially, the vast crimes took place after the bombing began: they were not a cause but a consequence." That was an untruth, as I demonstrated. I believe the agitprop you posted was riddled with untruths. Its central proposition is a vicious lie. Objectively.
the truth as we can know it from reading the internet i should have said. and yes the 'truth' can be subjective by perspective, for one. but that is another argument.
just because this crime you present is true at least in as much as those people in those photographs ARE dead, horribly, does not mean that the above statement is a lie. if we, for example' sake, say that there were maybe 300 dead in those photos, but 3000 are dead now, after the bombing-than the VAST number of crimes took place during and after the bombing. capiche? war is a lie. a lie for theft. always. doesn't the bible you covet so much tell you that to covet your neighbors stuff is a sin?
Home
Search
Calendar
Login
Register