wth? believe me?
wow!
look u crazy rabbit-i used ur other comment because it was a comment about MY post, wasn't it? maybe i'm wrong? i had NO comment about ur first post...so...i didn't comment! is there some requirement that says i must? u make comment to me-i usually make comment back. unless it doesn't deserve one, that is. i don't comment on every post anyone makes to any given topic. phew!
oh, wait...i get it-another of your circle jerks?
Umm, no babe, it had nothing to do with your post specificially. My first post covered everything you bitched about.
As far as circlekerks, no babe, I don't get pulled into donni f?cks, kentayfucks, or any other type of diversion.
I complimented you, and was going to post I have respect for you because althought I disagree with your ideology it does not change because of who is in power.
Now, return to the rabbit hole Alice. It it is tea time. I don't have time for your lower case break with reality.
oops!
i think we r having some miscommunications-sorry.
but- ur first post may have covered everything i bitched about- in as much as it called for a return to an adherence of our constitution, and yes- much of what i
**** about could be remedied with the correct application of our constitution - but your second post belied that as
your belief-it was ur opinion, apparently, that what i want is unconstitutional. i don't see how i could view your second comment in any way other than that-hence my next argument that is IS constitutional.
Home
Search
Calendar
Login
Register