Well said, actually.
Do you happen to know what this is referring to?
As a general statement, it stands without needing a reference.
So Clara obviously feels that storming a US EMBASSY, tearing down our flag, and replacing it with a black flag because US Egyptian Christians made a movie they don't like is perfectly acceptable.
I'm not sure that she knows anything about the movie.
And judging from her content she does not have the urge to find out.
The circumstance doesn't render the statement false. Sorry.
The statement is in reaction to the the activities in Cairo and Libya. Can we glean from your position that you agree with the administration that the fault lie with the Egyptian Christians who are producing the movie in the US,
Can she seriously believe that an assault on the U.S. Embassy is justified? Actually, why not, O's embassy itself seems to think it is!
I don't see security detail. Show me where security staff is. Show me the guns.
Coleman, she is diverting. Answer this question. Are you saying you agree with the administration that blaming the Egyptian Christians for this is the proper response?
That isn't a question posed by the statement--that's something you invented.
Bullshit. That is exactly what the statement is saying. Where did they condemn the actions of the mob?
You are again parsing, trying to treat the statement out of context. Because you are clueless to the events that led up to the statement. I refuse to play your Save Clara's ass game.
Home
Search
Calendar
Login
Register