No argument from Ted S. either, I'll wager.
Most of the MSNBC hosts are pathetic. Maddow does seem to do her research but as I said, her staff will completely ignore important news that is unflattering for democrats while they focus like a laser on some trivial fact that makes conservatives look bad.
I can watch most of the FOX hosts but only because I generally agree with their views. But when I put my impartial observer hat on I really dislike O'Reilly and especially Hannity.
Greta Van Sustren is about all I can stand on Fox, and barely. It's entirely too great a departure from reality for my tastes. Frankly, I don't know what MSNBC sees in Chris Matthews either, for that matter. Maddow digs up news in scoops and you can't expect her to necessarily cover the same news everybody else covers....unless there's a big-ass-Topic A and the network steps in to do the armtwisting on that. How much is Maddow and how much is network arm-twisting, perhaps you know better than I do. Just don't pretend that Fox doesn't do the same sort of arm-twisting, if not more.
I don't know what you mean by "arm-twisting". Rachel is the one and only legitimate talent that MSLSD has, but her program is more ideologically driven than anything on Fox save El Sean-bo. She doesn't "cover" anything aside from the day's DNC and White House talking points, but I'll gladly concede that she does on a great job of presenting the agitprop.
Home
Search
Calendar
Login
Register