No argument from Ted S. either, I'll wager.
Most of the MSNBC hosts are pathetic. Maddow does seem to do her research but as I said, her staff will completely ignore important news that is unflattering for democrats while they focus like a laser on some trivial fact that makes conservatives look bad.
I can watch most of the FOX hosts but only because I generally agree with their views. But when I put my impartial observer hat on I really dislike O'Reilly and especially Hannity.
Greta Van Sustren is about all I can stand on Fox, and barely. It's entirely too great a departure from reality for my tastes. Frankly, I don't know what MSNBC sees in Chris Matthews either, for that matter. Maddow digs up news in scoops and you can't expect her to necessarily cover the same news everybody else covers....unless there's a big-ass-Topic A and the network steps in to do the armtwisting on that. How much is Maddow and how much is network arm-twisting, perhaps you know better than I do. Just don't pretend that Fox doesn't do the same sort of arm-twisting, if not more.
Fox is out there because it curves to the conservative base. If it was not a good site politicians would not go on it. The liberals don't like it because it caters to the conservatives and that is the entire reason. It's the same reason the hate Limbaugh, the same reason they hate beck and all the rest. Even Clara would be happy if there were no more Republicans. The problem that people don't see is that if there was another party that took the place of the Republicans, we would have the same problem over different issues
Home
Search
Calendar
Login
Register