Well, I'm not everybody's saviour. This is a call for everyone to put ideas on the table, not just me. I posit the 2nd Amendment vis a vis gun control as the issue to discuss. It is up for discussion.
Let's arrive at a solution, shall we? I doubt that the person who pulled the trigger regarded himself as soulless. Rather, I figure that he figured he was justified in what he did, by whatever justification (rationalization) he applied to thinking that his actions were a good idea at the time, twisted or not.
Up for examination is what is it about our laws that permits this sort of thing, repeatedly.
You are still being vague. I posit that in all the examples I gave support leaving the second amendment alone.
So what would you change.
1. Take all guns? That has been discussed.
2. If you support one how will stop criminals from having. They are criminals.
3. Aurora already had tough laws on the books that banned the concealment that the perp did. So what do you propose.
4. The laws did not permit that sort of thing.
What are your suggestions?
Home
Search
Calendar
Login
Register