CNN: The Most Trusted Name in News, hahahahahahaha...........

[wbcoleman]

Soledad O'Brien Caught Reading Liberal Blog During Heated Debate With Romney Adviser
By Noel Sheppard | August 13, 2012 | 22:31

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/08/13/soledad-obrien-caught-reading-liberal-blog-during-heated-debate-romne

What she's reading from is a TPM article titled "The Myth Of Paul Ryan The Bipartisan Leader" published Monday at 6:08 PM only a few hours before this program started.

So, a CNN anchor with her own daily program used a far-left website for her show prep before talking to a Republican guest.

Do you need any more evidence of just how far to the left the self-described "most trusted name in news" is or why its ratings continue to tank?

Bravo, Ali! Bravo!

Amusingly enough, O'Brien got some truth to power today when Mitt Romney surrogate John Sununu who told her she ought to "put an Obama bumper sticker on your forehead." One wonders what he'd have said had he seen the photos above!

[Woody]

Hell, many of the cut and paste threads we have read over the years come from there and think progress.

Right kentay?

[wbcoleman]

Hell, many of the cut and paste threads we have read over the years come from there and think progress.

Right kentay?

Would CNN put kentay on-air? ? ?

[Woody]

Hell, many of the cut and paste threads we have read over the years come from there and think progress.

Right kentay?

Would CNN put kentay on-air? ? ?

Sure.  Isn't he already on CNN?  I mean no one knows because they don't watch it anyway. 

[clistensprechen]

There's nothing wrong with looking over the talking points of both sides. It would be a journalistic irresponsibility NOT to, in a report on politics.

[Woody]

There's nothing wrong with looking over the talking points of both sides. It would be a journalistic irresponsibility NOT to, in a report on politics.

 



Nope, no agenda from this one. 

[clistensprechen]

There's nothing wrong with looking over the talking points of both sides. It would be a journalistic irresponsibility NOT to, in a report on politics.

 



Nope, no agenda from this one.

Cons love the ignorant, don't they. Journalists prefer to be informed, and good on 'em for that.

[wbcoleman]

There's nothing wrong with looking over the talking points of both sides. It would be a journalistic irresponsibility NOT to, in a report on politics.

 



Nope, no agenda from this one.

Cons love the ignorant, don't they. Journalists prefer to be informed, and good on 'em for that.

Oh, YEAH!!!

  :prop: :woot:

[kentay]

Watch it:

[Woody]

****, kentay has no clue what is in the Ryan plan, the Romney plan, or if there is an Obama plan. 

[wbcoleman]

****, kentay has no clue what is in the Ryan plan, the Romney plan, or if there is an Obama plan.

But what about Soledad O'Brien?

[Woody]

****, kentay has no clue what is in the Ryan plan, the Romney plan, or if there is an Obama plan.

But what about Soledad O'Brien?

Hell no.  She get's her news and talking points from the place kentay does. 

[Ted S]

I hardly ever watch CNN but I caught a few minutes of Piers Morgan last night with Rick Santorum.  My early impressions of mister Morgan is that he is kind of a dink to his conservative guests.  Last night didn't disappoint.

[wbcoleman]

I hardly ever watch CNN but I caught a few minutes of Piers Morgan last night with Rick Santorum.  My early impressions of mister Morgan is that he is kind of a dink to his conservative guests.  Last night didn't disappoint.

I wonder how many people would willingly pay 25c for the privilege of watching Piers Morgan interview Rick Sanctorum.   :dunno: