Maher & Maddow are Nonpartisan

[Ted S]

Bill Maher and guest Rachel Maddow made the ludicrous claim that neither one of them is partisan on Maher's show this week.  Nick Gillespie, the true nonpartisan, called them on it.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/06/22/maher_maddow_deny_being_partisan_cant_name_republican_they_agree_with.html

And I'm supposed to believe them about anything else after making a howler like that?

[Don Houston]

Yea OK.  If you believe that Ted, I got some ocean front property in Arizona with an awesome view of the Golden Gate Bridge and the SF bay

[RWE]

Yea OK.  If you believe that Ted,...

They don't expect Ted to believe it. That's just for their ignorant fans.

[Don Houston]

I was being a Smart ass

[clistensprechen]

Bill Maher and guest Rachel Maddow made the ludicrous claim that neither one of them is partisan on Maher's show this week.  Nick Gillespie, the true nonpartisan, called them on it.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/06/22/maher_maddow_deny_being_partisan_cant_name_republican_they_agree_with.html

And I'm supposed to believe them about anything else after making a howler like that?

The howler is caling Nick Gillespie "true nonpartisan", actually. Too many conservatives mistake liberalism for partisanship.

[clistensprechen]

Yea OK.  If you believe that Ted,...

They don't expect Ted to believe it. That's just for their ignorant fans.

I'm not ignorant, hon.

[RWE]

Then you must realize that they are both lying to you when they profess to be nonpartisan.

[wbcoleman]

Bill Maher and guest Rachel Maddow made the ludicrous claim that neither one of them is partisan on Maher's show this week.  Nick Gillespie, the true nonpartisan, called them on it.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/06/22/maher_maddow_deny_being_partisan_cant_name_republican_they_agree_with.html

And I'm supposed to believe them about anything else after making a howler like that?

The howler is caling Nick Gillespie "true nonpartisan", actually. Too many conservatives mistake liberalism for partisanship.

So Nick Gillespie is partisan.  Therefore......... what?  Maher's and Rachel's inane claims are less inane?

[Ted S]

Gillespie generally sides with Republicans on fiscal issues and Democrats on social issues.  This makes him more nonpartisan in my eyes than Maher or Maddow because they side exclusively with Democrats and cannot even name one Republican they agree with.  The fact that they see themselves as nonpartisan is laughable.  Other than Maher's (and Jon Stewart's) audience of uninformed lemmings who on earth would believe that these two have no agenda?

The big difference is that extreme partisans on the right like Limbaugh and Hannity admit that they have a conservative agenda and back Republicans 100% of the time.  Only delusional Rhodes scholars of the left like Maddow try to pass off complete nonsense like this with a straight face.

[clistensprechen]

Fact is, neither Maddow nor Maher have an agenda. Cons like to automatically slap Maddow with a charge of agenda simply because she's gay, hoping everybody forgets about the Log Cabin Republicans. Being gay doesn't automatically make an agenda presumable, and it appears you fell for the ole con canard.

[Don Houston]

What does a persons sexual preference have to do  with anything?

[Ted S]

Fact is, neither Maddow nor Maher have an agenda

Are you kidding me?  They have a leftist agenda pure and simple.  They only time they are critical of Democrats are when Democrats aren't far enough to the left for them.  It's fine to be a leftist but let's have some truth in labeling huh.

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, swims like a duck, quacks like a duck......... it's a duck.

[Ted S]

What does a persons sexual preference have to do  with anything?

I think the rational goes something like this:  Maddow's political position is so plainly good and correct and right that the only reason anyone could possibly disagree with her is because they are a ______ (choose one) racist, misogynist, homophobe, etc.

[RWE]

Bill Maher makes $1 million donation to Obama super PAC
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/maher-donates-1-million-obama-super-pac-131123895.html

I guess the check to the Romney PAC got lost in the mail.

[wbcoleman]

Fact is, neither Maddow nor Maher have an agenda. Cons like to automatically slap Maddow with a charge of agenda simply because she's gay, hoping everybody forgets about the Log Cabin Republicans. Being gay doesn't automatically make an agenda presumable, and it appears you fell for the ole con canard.

Rachel being gay has nothing to do with the fact that she has an agenda of promoting O and other liberal Democrats.