Forbes Magazine Succumbs to Obama

[clistensprechen]

So Forbes is full of **** and is still printing? Whoaaaaaaaaah, whod-a thunk it?!

Forbes debunked--Forbes Fail.

Imagine that!  :hairfire:

The straight-line CBO accounts of outlays that MarketWatch and PolitiFact used are distorted by the fact that repayments of TARP funds by banks and Wall Street firms in 2010 make the actual spending seem much smaller.

Yeah, when stuff is paid back cuz it's a loan and not budget spending, that ain't fair.  Washington Post's pants are on fire.

No... When the loan was made it was added to Bush's spending. When it was paid back it was subtracted from Obama's spending. If Bush made the loan and any of it was paid back, then that amount should be deducted from Bush's spending.

Nice tap dance you're doing, but I'm not buying it.

[RWE]

So Forbes is full of **** and is still printing? Whoaaaaaaaaah, whod-a thunk it?!

Forbes debunked--Forbes Fail.

Imagine that!  :hairfire:

The straight-line CBO accounts of outlays that MarketWatch and PolitiFact used are distorted by the fact that repayments of TARP funds by banks and Wall Street firms in 2010 make the actual spending seem much smaller.

Yeah, when stuff is paid back cuz it's a loan and not budget spending, that ain't fair.  Washington Post's pants are on fire.

No... When the loan was made it was added to Bush's spending. When it was paid back it was subtracted from Obama's spending. If Bush made the loan and any of it was paid back, then that amount should be deducted from Bush's spending.

Nice tap dance you're doing, but I'm not buying it.

Do all the Independents bent over backwards to kiss Obama's butt, or just you?

[clistensprechen]

So Forbes is full of **** and is still printing? Whoaaaaaaaaah, whod-a thunk it?!

Forbes debunked--Forbes Fail.

Imagine that!  :hairfire:

The straight-line CBO accounts of outlays that MarketWatch and PolitiFact used are distorted by the fact that repayments of TARP funds by banks and Wall Street firms in 2010 make the actual spending seem much smaller.

Yeah, when stuff is paid back cuz it's a loan and not budget spending, that ain't fair.  Washington Post's pants are on fire.

No... When the loan was made it was added to Bush's spending. When it was paid back it was subtracted from Obama's spending. If Bush made the loan and any of it was paid back, then that amount should be deducted from Bush's spending.

Nice tap dance you're doing, but I'm not buying it.

Do all the Independents bent over backwards to kiss Obama's butt, or just you?

Some do, some don't. I'm voting for facts over fantasy and I know I'm not the only independent who does. I hold no love for the Democrat Party but damn--they're not the circular firing squad that the GOP has become.