Registrations are subject to Admin approval.Alternate method is to email a request to join to clistensprechen@yahoo.com
Quote from: donni on August 02, 2012, 07:43:21 pmQuote from: wbcoleman on August 02, 2012, 07:39:02 pmQuote from: donni on August 02, 2012, 06:58:47 pmQuote from: wbcoleman on July 24, 2012, 03:53:20 amQuote from: Woody on July 23, 2012, 02:25:37 pmI stand by ny argument that this individual would have attacked the theater without guns. He was hellbent on an attack. The shooter is the killer and solely responsible.In all honestly, it's hard for me to understand how the Second Amendment protects amassing an arsenal like this one.really? i guess u don't understand the phrase-'shall not be infringed upon', then? mmmn, seems pretty straight forward to me.Justice Scalia recently went public and made it very clear that the Second Amendment does NOT prevent some reasonable level of regulation.http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/29/scalia-opens-door-for-gun-control-legislation/justice scalia is god? why does he get to infringe? doesn't HE know what that word means?His opinion counts for a great deal.
Quote from: wbcoleman on August 02, 2012, 07:39:02 pmQuote from: donni on August 02, 2012, 06:58:47 pmQuote from: wbcoleman on July 24, 2012, 03:53:20 amQuote from: Woody on July 23, 2012, 02:25:37 pmI stand by ny argument that this individual would have attacked the theater without guns. He was hellbent on an attack. The shooter is the killer and solely responsible.In all honestly, it's hard for me to understand how the Second Amendment protects amassing an arsenal like this one.really? i guess u don't understand the phrase-'shall not be infringed upon', then? mmmn, seems pretty straight forward to me.Justice Scalia recently went public and made it very clear that the Second Amendment does NOT prevent some reasonable level of regulation.http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/29/scalia-opens-door-for-gun-control-legislation/justice scalia is god? why does he get to infringe? doesn't HE know what that word means?
Quote from: donni on August 02, 2012, 06:58:47 pmQuote from: wbcoleman on July 24, 2012, 03:53:20 amQuote from: Woody on July 23, 2012, 02:25:37 pmI stand by ny argument that this individual would have attacked the theater without guns. He was hellbent on an attack. The shooter is the killer and solely responsible.In all honestly, it's hard for me to understand how the Second Amendment protects amassing an arsenal like this one.really? i guess u don't understand the phrase-'shall not be infringed upon', then? mmmn, seems pretty straight forward to me.Justice Scalia recently went public and made it very clear that the Second Amendment does NOT prevent some reasonable level of regulation.http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/29/scalia-opens-door-for-gun-control-legislation/
Quote from: wbcoleman on July 24, 2012, 03:53:20 amQuote from: Woody on July 23, 2012, 02:25:37 pmI stand by ny argument that this individual would have attacked the theater without guns. He was hellbent on an attack. The shooter is the killer and solely responsible.In all honestly, it's hard for me to understand how the Second Amendment protects amassing an arsenal like this one.really? i guess u don't understand the phrase-'shall not be infringed upon', then? mmmn, seems pretty straight forward to me.
Quote from: Woody on July 23, 2012, 02:25:37 pmI stand by ny argument that this individual would have attacked the theater without guns. He was hellbent on an attack. The shooter is the killer and solely responsible.In all honestly, it's hard for me to understand how the Second Amendment protects amassing an arsenal like this one.
I stand by ny argument that this individual would have attacked the theater without guns. He was hellbent on an attack. The shooter is the killer and solely responsible.
Home
Search
Calendar
Login
Register