Author Topic: Aurora Might Do What Fast & Furious Couldn't  (Read 1210 times)

Offline wbcoleman

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Aurora Might Do What Fast & Furious Couldn't
« Reply #75 on: August 02, 2012, 07:39:02 pm »
I stand by ny argument that this individual would have attacked the theater without guns.  He was hellbent on an attack.  The shooter is the killer and solely responsible.

In all honestly, it's hard for me to understand how the Second Amendment protects amassing an arsenal like this one.

really? i guess u don't understand the phrase-'shall not be infringed upon', then? mmmn, seems pretty straight forward to me.

Justice Scalia recently went public and made it very clear that the Second Amendment does NOT prevent some reasonable level of regulation.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/29/scalia-opens-door-for-gun-control-legislation/
Zionism is the National Liberation Movement of the Jewish People.

Offline donni

  • Hypercritter
  • Crysalis
  • *********
  • Posts: 228
Re: Aurora Might Do What Fast & Furious Couldn't
« Reply #76 on: August 02, 2012, 07:41:18 pm »
One thing I'd say we do is teach morality to our kids. Teach them right from wrong.  Have the schools teach the Golden Rule and let parents and churches give them additional guidance. 

Nobody should be forced to go to a church but for the life of me I can't understand why the left is constantly berating Christian religion when it does so much good.  Yes Kentay, Christianity falls short of perfection but it does far more good than harm.

that's the problem-the supposed ADULTS are failing in that rule miserably. we are a warring nation that steals other poor countries resources as fast as we can under the pretense of defense. kids are not stupid-they know when they are unLoved. just look at our schools and how many kids have bad health. they know we are killing in the name of mammon and they resent your teaching morals you yourself do NOT possess. reap what you sow!


For real donni?  You still selling the "steals other poor countries resources as fast as we can under the pretense of defense" spiel?   ::) :wuv: 


PS.  You don't steal from poor countries.  They have nothing we want.  Kina like robbing a poor person.

africa is considered a poor nation, yet they are rich in diamonds, minerals, etc. why aren't they rich-shouldn't they be?

and yes-they are so craven they steal from those who know not what they have or cannot defend it even if they do. they steal by setting up craven criminals as 'leaders' in 'poor' countries and then get them to steal from their own people for us and for their own enrichment.

i guess you fell off the turnip truck years ago... ::)

Offline donni

  • Hypercritter
  • Crysalis
  • *********
  • Posts: 228
Re: Aurora Might Do What Fast & Furious Couldn't
« Reply #77 on: August 02, 2012, 07:43:21 pm »
I stand by ny argument that this individual would have attacked the theater without guns.  He was hellbent on an attack.  The shooter is the killer and solely responsible.

In all honestly, it's hard for me to understand how the Second Amendment protects amassing an arsenal like this one.

really? i guess u don't understand the phrase-'shall not be infringed upon', then? mmmn, seems pretty straight forward to me.

Justice Scalia recently went public and made it very clear that the Second Amendment does NOT prevent some reasonable level of regulation.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/29/scalia-opens-door-for-gun-control-legislation/

justice scalia is god? why does he get to infringe? doesn't HE know what that word means?

Offline wbcoleman

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Aurora Might Do What Fast & Furious Couldn't
« Reply #78 on: August 02, 2012, 07:44:34 pm »
I stand by ny argument that this individual would have attacked the theater without guns.  He was hellbent on an attack.  The shooter is the killer and solely responsible.

In all honestly, it's hard for me to understand how the Second Amendment protects amassing an arsenal like this one.

really? i guess u don't understand the phrase-'shall not be infringed upon', then? mmmn, seems pretty straight forward to me.

Justice Scalia recently went public and made it very clear that the Second Amendment does NOT prevent some reasonable level of regulation.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/29/scalia-opens-door-for-gun-control-legislation/

justice scalia is god? why does he get to infringe? doesn't HE know what that word means?

His opinion counts for a great deal.
Zionism is the National Liberation Movement of the Jewish People.

Offline donni

  • Hypercritter
  • Crysalis
  • *********
  • Posts: 228
Re: Aurora Might Do What Fast & Furious Couldn't
« Reply #79 on: August 02, 2012, 07:48:09 pm »
I stand by ny argument that this individual would have attacked the theater without guns.  He was hellbent on an attack.  The shooter is the killer and solely responsible.

In all honestly, it's hard for me to understand how the Second Amendment protects amassing an arsenal like this one.

really? i guess u don't understand the phrase-'shall not be infringed upon', then? mmmn, seems pretty straight forward to me.

Justice Scalia recently went public and made it very clear that the Second Amendment does NOT prevent some reasonable level of regulation.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/29/scalia-opens-door-for-gun-control-legislation/

justice scalia is god? why does he get to infringe? doesn't HE know what that word means?

His opinion counts for a great deal.

i know not why.

Offline wbcoleman

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Aurora Might Do What Fast & Furious Couldn't
« Reply #80 on: August 02, 2012, 08:07:30 pm »
I stand by ny argument that this individual would have attacked the theater without guns.  He was hellbent on an attack.  The shooter is the killer and solely responsible.

In all honestly, it's hard for me to understand how the Second Amendment protects amassing an arsenal like this one.

really? i guess u don't understand the phrase-'shall not be infringed upon', then? mmmn, seems pretty straight forward to me.

Justice Scalia recently went public and made it very clear that the Second Amendment does NOT prevent some reasonable level of regulation.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/29/scalia-opens-door-for-gun-control-legislation/

justice scalia is god? why does he get to infringe? doesn't HE know what that word means?

His opinion counts for a great deal.

i know not why.

uhhhh..... because he sits on the U.S. Supreme Court.
Zionism is the National Liberation Movement of the Jewish People.

Offline Woody

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1184
  • Location: Anywhere
Re: Aurora Might Do What Fast & Furious Couldn't
« Reply #81 on: August 02, 2012, 08:08:58 pm »
One thing I'd say we do is teach morality to our kids. Teach them right from wrong.  Have the schools teach the Golden Rule and let parents and churches give them additional guidance. 

Nobody should be forced to go to a church but for the life of me I can't understand why the left is constantly berating Christian religion when it does so much good.  Yes Kentay, Christianity falls short of perfection but it does far more good than harm.

that's the problem-the supposed ADULTS are failing in that rule miserably. we are a warring nation that steals other poor countries resources as fast as we can under the pretense of defense. kids are not stupid-they know when they are unLoved. just look at our schools and how many kids have bad health. they know we are killing in the name of mammon and they resent your teaching morals you yourself do NOT possess. reap what you sow!


For real donni?  You still selling the "steals other poor countries resources as fast as we can under the pretense of defense" spiel?   ::) :wuv: 


PS.  You don't steal from poor countries.  They have nothing we want.  Kina like robbing a poor person.

africa is considered a poor nation, yet they are rich in diamonds, minerals, etc. why aren't they rich-shouldn't they be?

and yes-they are so craven they steal from those who know not what they have or cannot defend it even if they do. they steal by setting up craven criminals as 'leaders' in 'poor' countries and then get them to steal from their own people for us and for their own enrichment.

i guess you fell off the turnip truck years ago... ::)


Donni, I luv ya, and god loves ya too.  But you are a hoot.  Your original premise of the "us steals other poor countries resources as fast as we can under the pretense of defense" and using the diamond trade to support your premise laughable.
A reminder for kentay:
I fully support going back to ALL, that says ALL THE CLINTON TAX and spend policies that led to the economic boom in the second half of the 90's.

Offline donni

  • Hypercritter
  • Crysalis
  • *********
  • Posts: 228
Re: Aurora Might Do What Fast & Furious Couldn't
« Reply #82 on: August 04, 2012, 01:56:44 pm »
One thing I'd say we do is teach morality to our kids. Teach them right from wrong.  Have the schools teach the Golden Rule and let parents and churches give them additional guidance. 

Nobody should be forced to go to a church but for the life of me I can't understand why the left is constantly berating Christian religion when it does so much good.  Yes Kentay, Christianity falls short of perfection but it does far more good than harm.

that's the problem-the supposed ADULTS are failing in that rule miserably. we are a warring nation that steals other poor countries resources as fast as we can under the pretense of defense. kids are not stupid-they know when they are unLoved. just look at our schools and how many kids have bad health. they know we are killing in the name of mammon and they resent your teaching morals you yourself do NOT possess. reap what you sow!


For real donni?  You still selling the "steals other poor countries resources as fast as we can under the pretense of defense" spiel?   ::) :wuv: 


PS.  You don't steal from poor countries.  They have nothing we want.  Kina like robbing a poor person.

africa is considered a poor nation, yet they are rich in diamonds, minerals, etc. why aren't they rich-shouldn't they be?

and yes-they are so craven they steal from those who know not what they have or cannot defend it even if they do. they steal by setting up craven criminals as 'leaders' in 'poor' countries and then get them to steal from their own people for us and for their own enrichment.

i guess you fell off the turnip truck years ago... ::)


Donni, I luv ya, and god loves ya too.  But you are a hoot.  Your original premise of the "us steals other poor countries resources as fast as we can under the pretense of defense" and using the diamond trade to support your premise laughable.


Love includes respect-i see no respect in your response to me-therefore i can only conclude that you do not understand the true meaning of Love.

i could find many more examples of american theft, avarice, etc., but i think you already know in your heart what i am talking about- you are just rowing the river hard. i am sorry for you-i know it's hard to wake up to your own ignorance-i did it and i am still doing it. now i know, i will LEARN till i die- happily. i will not think i know, for sure-ever again. i will always hold out the possibility i may be wrong and act with compassion for the other side of any argument. this is Love. what are you doing?

Offline Woody

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1184
  • Location: Anywhere
Re: Aurora Might Do What Fast & Furious Couldn't
« Reply #83 on: August 04, 2012, 02:32:19 pm »
One thing I'd say we do is teach morality to our kids. Teach them right from wrong.  Have the schools teach the Golden Rule and let parents and churches give them additional guidance. 

Nobody should be forced to go to a church but for the life of me I can't understand why the left is constantly berating Christian religion when it does so much good.  Yes Kentay, Christianity falls short of perfection but it does far more good than harm.

that's the problem-the supposed ADULTS are failing in that rule miserably. we are a warring nation that steals other poor countries resources as fast as we can under the pretense of defense. kids are not stupid-they know when they are unLoved. just look at our schools and how many kids have bad health. they know we are killing in the name of mammon and they resent your teaching morals you yourself do NOT possess. reap what you sow!


For real donni?  You still selling the "steals other poor countries resources as fast as we can under the pretense of defense" spiel?   ::) :wuv: 


PS.  You don't steal from poor countries.  They have nothing we want.  Kina like robbing a poor person.

africa is considered a poor nation, yet they are rich in diamonds, minerals, etc. why aren't they rich-shouldn't they be?

and yes-they are so craven they steal from those who know not what they have or cannot defend it even if they do. they steal by setting up craven criminals as 'leaders' in 'poor' countries and then get them to steal from their own people for us and for their own enrichment.

i guess you fell off the turnip truck years ago... ::)


Donni, I luv ya, and god loves ya too.  But you are a hoot.  Your original premise of the "us steals other poor countries resources as fast as we can under the pretense of defense" and using the diamond trade to support your premise laughable.


Love includes respect-i see no respect in your response to me-therefore i can only conclude that you do not understand the true meaning of Love.

i could find many more examples of american theft, avarice, etc., but i think you already know in your heart what i am talking about- you are just rowing the river hard. i am sorry for you-i know it's hard to wake up to your own ignorance-i did it and i am still doing it. now i know, i will LEARN till i die- happily. i will not think i know, for sure-ever again. i will always hold out the possibility i may be wrong and act with compassion for the other side of any argument. this is Love. what are you doing?


No, I really don't know what you are talking about and trust me, if you could post these legitimate examples you would.
A reminder for kentay:
I fully support going back to ALL, that says ALL THE CLINTON TAX and spend policies that led to the economic boom in the second half of the 90's.

Offline donni

  • Hypercritter
  • Crysalis
  • *********
  • Posts: 228
Re: Aurora Might Do What Fast & Furious Couldn't
« Reply #84 on: August 04, 2012, 06:52:26 pm »
"Here is the other question that I have been leading toward, one that the predicament of modern warfare forces upon us: How many deaths of other people's children by bombing or starvation are we willing to accept in order that we may be affluent, and (supposedly) at peace? To that question I answer: None. Please, no children. Don't kill any children for my benefit. ..."-wendell berry

what do you think wendell is talking about, woody? specifically the bolded parts?

that would be our wars in supposed defense to steal/plunder. there are many examples of this...since the americans conquered the indians they've been doing it. its old-we shouldn't fall for this  :bull: any more.

Offline Woody

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1184
  • Location: Anywhere
Re: Aurora Might Do What Fast & Furious Couldn't
« Reply #85 on: August 04, 2012, 06:54:41 pm »
"Here is the other question that I have been leading toward, one that the predicament of modern warfare forces upon us: How many deaths of other people's children by bombing or starvation are we willing to accept in order that we may be affluent, and (supposedly) at peace? To that question I answer: None. Please, no children. Don't kill any children for my benefit. ..."-wendell berry

what do you think wendell is talking about, woody? specifically the bolded parts?

that would be our wars in supposed defense to steal/plunder. there are many examples of this...since the americans conquered the indians they've been doing it. its old-we shouldn't fall for this  :bull: any more.
:bull: :bull:




Still waiting for your examples.  Let me know when you post them donni.
A reminder for kentay:
I fully support going back to ALL, that says ALL THE CLINTON TAX and spend policies that led to the economic boom in the second half of the 90's.

Offline donni

  • Hypercritter
  • Crysalis
  • *********
  • Posts: 228
Re: Aurora Might Do What Fast & Furious Couldn't
« Reply #86 on: August 04, 2012, 06:58:33 pm »
I stand by ny argument that this individual would have attacked the theater without guns.  He was hellbent on an attack.  The shooter is the killer and solely responsible.

In all honestly, it's hard for me to understand how the Second Amendment protects amassing an arsenal like this one.

really? i guess u don't understand the phrase-'shall not be infringed upon', then? mmmn, seems pretty straight forward to me.

Justice Scalia recently went public and made it very clear that the Second Amendment does NOT prevent some reasonable level of regulation.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/29/scalia-opens-door-for-gun-control-legislation/

justice scalia is god? why does he get to infringe? doesn't HE know what that word means?

His opinion counts for a great deal.

i know not why.

uhhhh..... because he sits on the U.S. Supreme Court.

by whose authority does he get to change the constitution? amendments must be voted in. this one is hard to amend because it is sooo clear. no law shall be made that will infringe on this right it says or something close. so how can scalia just decide to regulate (make law) on something he is strictly, and in no uncertain terms, bid not to do?

Offline donni

  • Hypercritter
  • Crysalis
  • *********
  • Posts: 228
Re: Aurora Might Do What Fast & Furious Couldn't
« Reply #87 on: August 04, 2012, 07:05:54 pm »
"Here is the other question that I have been leading toward, one that the predicament of modern warfare forces upon us: How many deaths of other people's children by bombing or starvation are we willing to accept in order that we may be affluent, and (supposedly) at peace? To that question I answer: None. Please, no children. Don't kill any children for my benefit. ..."-wendell berry

what do you think wendell is talking about, woody? specifically the bolded parts?

that would be our wars in supposed defense to steal/plunder. there are many examples of this...since the americans conquered the indians they've been doing it. its old-we shouldn't fall for this  :bull: any more.
:bull: :bull:




Still waiting for your examples.  Let me know when you post them donni.

well, i guess u missed it-the american indian was one, the panama canal is another, the iraq war, another.

u'll prolly not look at this very carefully either-

http://www.thedebate.org/thedebate/iraq.asp

Offline donni

  • Hypercritter
  • Crysalis
  • *********
  • Posts: 228
Re: Aurora Might Do What Fast & Furious Couldn't
« Reply #88 on: August 04, 2012, 07:07:18 pm »
hawaii-another.

Offline Woody

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1184
  • Location: Anywhere
Re: Aurora Might Do What Fast & Furious Couldn't
« Reply #89 on: August 04, 2012, 07:17:45 pm »
hawaii-another.


That's all you got?  Anything more recent?  You are floundering here.  What war did we have in Hawaii?  You said we are a warring nation that steals the resources of poor nations.



A reminder for kentay:
I fully support going back to ALL, that says ALL THE CLINTON TAX and spend policies that led to the economic boom in the second half of the 90's.