I stand by ny argument that this individual would have attacked the theater without guns. He was hellbent on an attack. The shooter is the killer and solely responsible.
In all honestly, it's hard for me to understand how the Second Amendment protects amassing an arsenal like this one.
really? i guess u don't understand the phrase-'shall not be infringed upon', then? mmmn, seems pretty straight forward to me.
Justice Scalia recently went public and made it very clear that the Second Amendment does NOT prevent some reasonable level of regulation.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/29/scalia-opens-door-for-gun-control-legislation/
justice scalia is god? why does he get to infringe? doesn't HE know what that word means?
His opinion counts for a great deal.
i know not why.
uhhhh..... because he sits on the U.S. Supreme Court.
by whose authority does he get to change the constitution? amendments must be voted in. this one is hard to amend because it is sooo clear. no law shall be made that will infringe on this right it says or something close. so how can scalia just decide to regulate (make law) on something he is strictly, and in no uncertain terms, bid not to do?
Home
Search
Calendar
Login
Register