«
Reply #15 on: August 08, 2012, 10:35:44 pm »
Ummm....you're the one doing the twisting, actually.
Cons claim that governments don't create jobs, job creators do, therefore they require little to no taxes...all the while blaming the president for the unemployment rate. I'm flattered that you think I invented all the con talking points, but my interest in truth demands that I take no credit for con talking points.
Umm Clara, let me tell you the same thing that I have told kentay and others like you for years. I don't give a **** what "cons" say. I will not deend what YOU claim cons say. I will defend what I say. So no I personally have not twisted ****. Nod when you understand.
So back to you comments. On one post you claim Obama can only create government jobs (patently false considering congress has to appropriate the funds) and on anther you blame bush (stadard tactic) for the uneloyment rate THREE AND A HALF YEARS after he left office.
I understand and respect the fact this is your forum but that doesn't entitle hou to hour own facts. But damn girl, you are flapping around like a 20 knot windsock in a 50 knot swirling gale.
I say again, and as many times as necessary--I was repeating what cons say. I'm glad that we agree: what cons say is FALSE.
Thank you, Woody! :wuv:
Notice how Clara lies to distract from discussing the hypocrisy of her own posts. I said no such thing.
Great diversion babe. Same
**** different forum.
So back to you comments. On one post you claim Obama can only create government jobs (patently false considering congress has to appropriate the funds) and on anther you blame bush (stadard tactic) for the uneloyment rate THREE AND A HALF YEARS after he left office
« Last Edit: August 08, 2012, 10:39:55 pm by Woody »

Logged
A reminder for kentay:
I fully support going back to ALL, that says ALL THE CLINTON TAX and spend policies that led to the economic boom in the second half of the 90's.