Woody, pay attention when I say (and repeat) that Dubya was just a rubber stamp for a Congress that ran itself like a Politburo with Dubya its Premiere. The problem wasn't so much Dubya as it was his Party. You know, the same Party that wants the keys to the republic back so it can run it further into the ground with the same ole ****. The Architect ain't running but he's still Architecting. He ain't retired, and he's still a part of the problem.
Clara, read this very carefully. If you can not understand it get someone to explained it to you. You blamed bush, so I asked you to post the specific policies that bush was responsible for and now you claim he was a rubber stamp for congress. Now you claim it was congress. So, tell us what specific policies that congress turned into laws that bush signed to create the mess we are in almost 4 years since he left office.
You would think that Clara could post these laws that congress passed. Shouldn't be that hard.
Next, I asked you what the democrats proposed when taking it over in 2007 that would have reversed the trend. Still nothing.
Bush is not on the ballot.
I ain't up for doing heavy research at this time of night, hon. I was basically agreeing with you that it's not Dubya's fault EXCEPT FOR THE FACT HE DIDN'T VETO ANY OF THE BILLS THAT POLITBURO CONGRESS SENT TO HIS DESK. He rubber stamped every single one of 'em like a good li'l party boy.
And I'll grant you that a lot of the financial problems coming home to roost began with Reagan and I know, he's not running for office either. My point:
IT'S THE PARTY'S FAULT, AND YOU WANT US TO PUT THE PARTY WHOSE FAULT IT IS BACK IN POWER.
Reagan actually had to clean up the Savings & Loan mess left over from the Carter era, did he not? And the roots of the 2007-2008 crisis lie, at least in part, from the 1990's.
I don't recall Reagan blaming his predecessor continuously either or making excuses.
Yeah, I think he mostly devoted himself to cleaning up the mess.