Author Topic: This Video MIGHT Stop Romney From Becoming President  (Read 522 times)

Offline clistensprechen

  • High Lord Umpire
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *******
  • Posts: 1460
Bonnie Ronnie's Greenspan. Don't you believe Clinton did.

Offline wbcoleman

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1391
Bonnie Ronnie's Greenspan. Don't you believe Clinton did.

Well, putting aside the question of WHO REAPPOINTED GREENSPAN NOT ONCE BUT TWICE, in 1996 and in 2000, you might want to double-check whatever references you have on the regulatory appointment power.

Seriously, clara, why do you back yourself into these absurd contortions?
Zionism is the National Liberation Movement of the Jewish People.

Offline clistensprechen

  • High Lord Umpire
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *******
  • Posts: 1460
Bonnie Ronnie's Greenspan. Don't you believe Clinton did.

Well, putting aside the question of WHO REAPPOINTED GREENSPAN NOT ONCE BUT TWICE, in 1996 and in 2000, you might want to double-check whatever references you have on the regulatory appointment power.

Seriously, clara, why do you back yourself into these absurd contortions?
I don't. You're pretending that the Clintons were both savvy investors that deliberately weaseled their Whitewater deals (which cons failed to find any fish in, during their legal fishing expedition). People who aren't experts consult experts, and Greenspan was a celebrated expert.

Offline wbcoleman

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1391
Bonnie Ronnie's Greenspan. Don't you believe Clinton did.

Well, putting aside the question of WHO REAPPOINTED GREENSPAN NOT ONCE BUT TWICE, in 1996 and in 2000, you might want to double-check whatever references you have on the regulatory appointment power.

Seriously, clara, why do you back yourself into these absurd contortions?
I don't. You're pretending that the Clintons were both savvy investors that deliberately weaseled their Whitewater deals (which cons failed to find any fish in, during their legal fishing expedition). People who aren't experts consult experts, and Greenspan was a celebrated expert.

Another diversionary non-sequitor.  Neither the Clintons' investment savvy nor their Whitewater deals have anything to do with our discussion.  What's relevant is that Bill Clinton appointed ALL of the relevant regulatory officials.
Zionism is the National Liberation Movement of the Jewish People.

Offline clistensprechen

  • High Lord Umpire
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *******
  • Posts: 1460
Bonnie Ronnie's Greenspan. Don't you believe Clinton did.

Well, putting aside the question of WHO REAPPOINTED GREENSPAN NOT ONCE BUT TWICE, in 1996 and in 2000, you might want to double-check whatever references you have on the regulatory appointment power.

Seriously, clara, why do you back yourself into these absurd contortions?
I don't. You're pretending that the Clintons were both savvy investors that deliberately weaseled their Whitewater deals (which cons failed to find any fish in, during their legal fishing expedition). People who aren't experts consult experts, and Greenspan was a celebrated expert.

Another diversionary non-sequitor.  Neither the Clintons' investment savvy nor their Whitewater deals have anything to do with our discussion.  What's relevant is that Bill Clinton appointed ALL of the relevant regulatory officials.
...under advice and consent, silly. Re-read the Constitution.

Offline RWE

  • An irresponsible, homophobic, racist, reactionary, ex-nude model Certifiable
  • Hypercritter
  • Cub
  • *********
  • Posts: 448
Bonnie Ronnie's Greenspan. Don't you believe Clinton did.

I believe Clinton legitimately **** Juanita Broderick. Oops, sorry, wrong thread. 
The Founding Fathers established the first Dept. of Homeland Security. They called it "a Well Regulated Militia."

Offline clistensprechen

  • High Lord Umpire
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *******
  • Posts: 1460
Bonnie Ronnie's Greenspan. Don't you believe Clinton did.

I believe Clinton legitimately **** Juanita Broderick. Oops, sorry, wrong thread.
lol!

Consenting adults don't count as **** tho.

Offline wbcoleman

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1391
Bonnie Ronnie's Greenspan. Don't you believe Clinton did.

Well, putting aside the question of WHO REAPPOINTED GREENSPAN NOT ONCE BUT TWICE, in 1996 and in 2000, you might want to double-check whatever references you have on the regulatory appointment power.

Seriously, clara, why do you back yourself into these absurd contortions?
I don't. You're pretending that the Clintons were both savvy investors that deliberately weaseled their Whitewater deals (which cons failed to find any fish in, during their legal fishing expedition). People who aren't experts consult experts, and Greenspan was a celebrated expert.

Another diversionary non-sequitor.  Neither the Clintons' investment savvy nor their Whitewater deals have anything to do with our discussion.  What's relevant is that Bill Clinton appointed ALL of the relevant regulatory officials.
...under advice and consent, silly. Re-read the Constitution.

Yes, the Senate confirmed President Clinton's choices.  You ARE desperate!
Zionism is the National Liberation Movement of the Jewish People.

Offline wbcoleman

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1391
Bonnie Ronnie's Greenspan. Don't you believe Clinton did.

I believe Clinton legitimately **** Juanita Broderick. Oops, sorry, wrong thread.
lol!

Consenting adults don't count as **** tho.

Yes, Mr. Clinton appointed her to be his sexual partner.  And, hey, it HAD to be a "legitimate ****"; after all, she didn't get pregnant, right?
Zionism is the National Liberation Movement of the Jewish People.

Offline clistensprechen

  • High Lord Umpire
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *******
  • Posts: 1460
Bonnie Ronnie's Greenspan. Don't you believe Clinton did.

Well, putting aside the question of WHO REAPPOINTED GREENSPAN NOT ONCE BUT TWICE, in 1996 and in 2000, you might want to double-check whatever references you have on the regulatory appointment power.

Seriously, clara, why do you back yourself into these absurd contortions?
I don't. You're pretending that the Clintons were both savvy investors that deliberately weaseled their Whitewater deals (which cons failed to find any fish in, during their legal fishing expedition). People who aren't experts consult experts, and Greenspan was a celebrated expert.

Another diversionary non-sequitor.  Neither the Clintons' investment savvy nor their Whitewater deals have anything to do with our discussion.  What's relevant is that Bill Clinton appointed ALL of the relevant regulatory officials.
...under advice and consent, silly. Re-read the Constitution.

Yes, the Senate confirmed President Clinton's choices.  You ARE desperate!
I accept your concession. Thank you.

Offline donni

  • Hypercritter
  • Crysalis
  • *********
  • Posts: 228
donni, what you say about the market was true in the 1990's, the era of Chainsaw Al's glory, and is not true now, sorry. Chainsaw Al met his waterloo with Sunbeam and that market theory about cutting labor = market rise is gone with the wind and Chainsaw Al.  The market nosedived under the paradigm you describe and even Greenspan admitted to being wrong.

Please update your market fundamentals to this century.

"...the primary goal of any business should be to make money for its shareholders. To that end, he believed in making widespread cuts, including massive layoffs, in order to streamline operations. By firing thousands of employees at once and closing plants and factories, he drastically altered the economic status of such corporations as Scott Paper and Crown Zellerbach. He sold Scott Paper to Kimberly-Clark in 1995 for $7.8 billion and walked away with a $100 million golden parachute...."-wiki

nope this isn't happening anymore. ::) seems to me it is happening faster and faster. why are so many in prison instead of working or getting an education? why do so many young people see the military as an only option? because things have gotten better since the 90's? please-that is rubbish. obama changed nothing and that is exactly what they all wanted. you know those 'persons' called corporations? yea, them. the ones our politicians are so snuggly with? yea, them. and it does not matter dim or repug. the dim may do it fearfully, carefully, with remorse even-unlike the repug who seems to do it with zeal and righteousness, even (as if ::)), but they both do it. we need a real grassroots candidate or better yet a complete overhaul of our system. we need to get the rats, the foxes, the weasels, and the damn wolves out of OUR house! obomba had his chance and blew it-no pun intended! but i knew he was STILL THEM and nothing would change-the people acted like idiots over him. i wished he was what they expected, what he alluded he was....but i saw thru it pretty early-he did not get my vote. i am voting for peaceful revolution and i WILL not give them credence by voting for either. let's shake up this dog and pony show-let's prove we're not as stupid and shallow as they think we are. see they think we are them trying to 'take' theirs because that's what they do. so of course they are 'showing' themselves, finally, obviously. the emperors truly have not a stitch on and NOTHING to be proud of.

Offline clistensprechen

  • High Lord Umpire
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *******
  • Posts: 1460
Ya, times, they are a-changin'. You're not the only person who has noticed.  That wonderful "new paradigm" Wall Street was crowing about in the 1990's was fiction, and even Greenspan finally owned up to being wrong.

Somebody needs to do a temperature check of Hell. Looks like it might have frozen over.

Offline donni

  • Hypercritter
  • Crysalis
  • *********
  • Posts: 228
this sums it up nicely-

Welcoming a Warmonger to Town on Wednesday
By davidswanson - Posted on 22 August 2012

Wow, it's been a while, but protests of war makers in Charlottesville will be back big time next Wednesday. It seems like ages since we protested John Yoo, or even since our threatened protest of Dick Cheney scared him out of coming to town. But opportunity is knocking and a massive nonviolent protest is sure to answer.

How could it not? On Wednesday, Charlottesville will host a man who has escalated war in Afghanistan and continued it in the face of overwhelming public opposition. He's invented a new kind of war using drones and launched such wars in numerous nations, building intense hostility toward the United States. He keeps a list of "nominees" for murder. On the list are adults and children, Americans and non-Americans. He holds meetings with his staff on Tuesdays to decide whom to kill next, and then kills them. He'll have one of these Terror Tuesday meetings the day before his visit to our town.

We're dealing here with someone who has launched a war on Libya against the will of Congress, presumably an act even worse than telling Congress obvious lies and getting its approval, as Bush did on Iraq. This new war maker campaigned for office on expanding war in Afghanistan, expanding the size of the U.S. military, and using the U.S. military broadly. He's kept his promises. The military is larger and more expensive than it ever was under Bush. It's more secretive, with the CIA fighting some of the wars. It's more privatized. It's more profitable. It's in more nations. And it's sucking down a greater share of government spending.

Having replaced imprisonment and torture with murder, this new warmonger has established as open policy, no longer illicit, process-free imprisonment, rendition, and the option to use torture "if necessary." He has forbidden the prosecution of CIA torturers. He has created a legal and bipartisan acceptance of what we recently protested as scandalous outrages. He has launched a campaign of unprecedented retribution against whistleblowers. And now he has announced that the United States, without Congressional authorization or public approval, is engaged in assisting one side in a civil war in Syria -- even while continuing to threaten war on Iran.

I could go on. This new official has outdone others in the areas of corporate trade agreements, fossil fuel subsidies, tax breaks for the rich, bailouts for Wall Street and for health insurance corporations, and on and on. But just on the issue of militarism I've clearly said enough to mobilize those who have protested war makers in recent years.

Unless there's something different this time.

Perhaps it's more important to cheer for and apologize for one half of a corrupt government than it is to push that government in a democratic direction. Maybe the world is changed most effectively by behaving as spectators rooting for one side of a surface-level dispute between two corrupt forces mutually agreed on our destruction. Maybe the civil rights movement should have shut up and campaigned for Democrats. Maybe women voted themselves the right to vote. Perhaps the labor movement was really built through the electoral tactics that are currently destroying it.

You know, on second thought, I think I'll buy an Obama shirt and speak only when spoken to. He's the candidate of change, and I want to do whatever is most likely to change things.

Offline clistensprechen

  • High Lord Umpire
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *******
  • Posts: 1460
We will not go back.

Forward!

Offline donni

  • Hypercritter
  • Crysalis
  • *********
  • Posts: 228
We will not go back.

Forward!


i'm sorry,,,say what? ??? who is we? back to what/where? forward to what/where? who are you directing this? ???