Fox News Institutes Virtual Blackout Of Todd Akin’s ‘Legitimate ****’ Comments

[wbcoleman]

Holy cow, to what topic does Rachel's show appear to be dedicated??

The same one Hannity just covered just now on Fox.

whoa, whoa,  WHOA!  What about the title of this thread?

By the way, Mr. Hannity interviewed Mr. Akin, did he not?  And Mr. Hannity invited Mr. Akin to.... uh.... pack it in, did he not?

So, you're trying to tell me that Hannity got Akin to repeat his comment? Interesting. The title of this thread says that the comment was blacked out.  Try again, Mr. Desperate.

Speaking of desperate, another total non-sequitor in place of a rational response.

[clistensprechen]

So, in your book, pointing out the actual title of this thread is irrational, huh.  Okay, then, post the link from Fox News that shows the interview where Akin says what he did, same clip that got all the air play today.

If you had simply posted a link to where Fox News has that clip posted on their site, you would have proved the OP wrong.  You didn't, though, did you.

Stand and deliver.

[wbcoleman]

So, in your book, pointing out the actual title of this thread is irrational, huh.  Okay, then, post the link from Fox News that shows the interview where Akin says what he did, same clip that got all the air play today.

If you had simply posted a link to where Fox News has that clip posted on their site, you would have proved the OP wrong.  You didn't, though, did you.

Stand and deliver.

This is another non-sequitor, but "standing and delivering" what you want is trivially easy:

http://video.foxnews.com/v/1795592225001/rep-akins-****-comment-draws-widespread-criticism/?playlist_id=87937

[clistensprechen]

So, in your book, pointing out the actual title of this thread is irrational, huh.  Okay, then, post the link from Fox News that shows the interview where Akin says what he did, same clip that got all the air play today.

If you had simply posted a link to where Fox News has that clip posted on their site, you would have proved the OP wrong.  You didn't, though, did you.

Stand and deliver.

This is another non-sequitor, but "standing and delivering" what you want is trivially easy:

http://video.foxnews.com/v/1795592225001/rep-akins-****-comment-draws-widespread-criticism/?playlist_id=87937

And, so, you didn't post that in the first place because....?  Because that clip in there is only half of what Akin said that was covered as news elsewhere?  Where does Fox cover the crazy **** he said about women don't get pregnant from **** because of what a woman's body does?

This is inadequate.

[Woody]

Is the Right Rev Al devoting his entire show to Todd Akin?  Right now he's busy trying to tie Akin to Paul Ryan.

I think Rev Al needs a few cheeseburgers and then go back to the valuor warm up suits and the gold medallions.

Yeah, but Tweety's up next.  Then Ed.  Then Rachel.  Then Lawrence.

I lasted 5 minutes during his conversation with the congresswoman and the realclearpolitics women.  That was enough.  Back to judge dredd.

Wow, Tweety leads with the "caveman attack on women"!  Who'd have thunk it?

How much of the show can be devoted to Todd Akin?

Oh, just checked out Daily kos.... their entire front page is devoted to article after article about.... WHAT??

That's what you get for hanging around liberals too much. Cons are jumping all over Akin, too--I just heard that Rove's money machine just yanked support from him. As in Dubya's Architect. How can we forget Dubya when Rove won't go away? Well, apparently he did in Akin's case. From what I hear.

We have a winner.  Clara qualifies for a double dubya score!!!!!

[Woody]

The Rev Gym Suit Al led off his show with discussion of Aiken.

[clistensprechen]

...but by not addressing the missing part of Akin's comments in the Fox coverage, you admit that Fox has a blackout on that part.  Thank you.

May the ghost of Dubya haunt you forever.

[Woody]

...but by not addressing the missing part of Akin's comments in the Fox coverage, you admit that Fox has a blackout on that part.  Thank you.

May the ghost of Dubya haunt you forever.

WTF you blubbering about now? 


All I know is that the Joint Chief of staff's plane had a missile shot it, unemployment is still above 8 percent, the Islamist President of Egypt is going to Iran, an Israeli Tv station is reporting Netanyahu wants to attack Iran prior to our elections, an Iranian commander welcomes the attack and Iraq is helping Iran Sneak around sanctions.  Yet the only thing you Obamabots can prattle and froth about is FOX is discussing those things more than the Aiken Quote.


By all means, tell me how awful I am for thinking they are much more important stories.


So I thank you! :applause:    :applause:

[clistensprechen]

There are other topics on those topics you list, and I've gotta say that your admission of "that's all I know" comes off as a perjorative. You should know what topic this thread is about at the very least.

[Woody]

There are other topics on those topics you list, and I've gotta say that your admission of "that's all I know" comes off as a perjorative. You should know what topic this thread is about at the very least.

No problem Clara.  I thank you for insulting me because I think the faux war on women is not as important as the stories I listed.

 :applause: :applause: :applause:


Now, if ou got your news from Huey, Louie and Dewey over T MSOBAMA You wouldn't know of those stories.

[clistensprechen]

Then this topic is not for you.

And yet you remain!

 :woot:

[Woody]

Then this topic is not for you.

And yet you remain!

 :woot:

You keep responding.  Lead by example babe.  You are queen **** around here.




So tell me, in the grand scheme of things queenie is the Aiken story So important that MSNBC should devote a large portion of te schedule for two days discussing every angle of it? 


Yes, queenie, this topic is for me.  The humor of your complaints is te best! 

[wbcoleman]

So, in your book, pointing out the actual title of this thread is irrational, huh.  Okay, then, post the link from Fox News that shows the interview where Akin says what he did, same clip that got all the air play today.

If you had simply posted a link to where Fox News has that clip posted on their site, you would have proved the OP wrong.  You didn't, though, did you.

Stand and deliver.

This is another non-sequitor, but "standing and delivering" what you want is trivially easy:

http://video.foxnews.com/v/1795592225001/rep-akins-****-comment-draws-widespread-criticism/?playlist_id=87937

And, so, you didn't post that in the first place because....?  Because that clip in there is only half of what Akin said that was covered as news elsewhere?  Where does Fox cover the crazy **** he said about women don't get pregnant from **** because of what a woman's body does?

This is inadequate.

What the hell are you talking about?  He says exactly that at time index 0:20.

Why are you wasting our time?

[Ted S]

With all the surprise of a sunrise, Think Progress gets it wrong again:

http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/21/thinkprogress-blows-it-in-claim-of-fox-news-blackout-of-todd-akin-coverage/

[wbcoleman]

With all the surprise of a sunrise, Think Progress gets it wrong again:

http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/21/thinkprogress-blows-it-in-claim-of-fox-news-blackout-of-todd-akin-coverage/

Well, ted, the good news is that kentay will see to it that we're always up-to-speed on thinkprogress' mistakes!