Achin' Akin just won't go away.

[clistensprechen]

Todd Akin has generated a lot of hoots along the way, and none of 'em is better than the Raging Grannies got!




 :applause:

[kentay]

By Tara Culp-Ressler and Adam Peck on Aug 23, 2012



Vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan agrees with Akin that **** is not a valid reason to seek an abortion, a position he has publicly held as far back as 1998. Ryan actually has a slightly more extreme record on anti-abortion legislation than Akin does, earning an 100 percent pro-life rating from the National Right to Life Committee for his anti-choice votes in Congress while Akin earned a 90 percent rating during the same time period. Every single piece of anti-abortion legislation that Ryan has supported has been a bill co-sponsored by Akin. And the two have co-sponsored a considerable number of radical anti-choice measures together:
 

[clistensprechen]

Yup, those are the 8 bills Al Sharpton dug up.  Exactly.

[Woody]

Cool.  There is nothing in kentay's cut and paste that will overturn roe v wade or remove a women's right to choose an abortion.

[kentay]

Cool.  There is nothing in kentay's cut and paste that will overturn roe v wade or remove a women's right to choose an abortion.

Evidently you don't have a clue what your party is proposing against women. Her body will no longer be her own  after they have probed her womb, then old white men want to put her or any doctor in jail that performs an abortion for **** oor incest.

[Woody]

Cool.  There is nothing in kentay's cut and paste that will overturn roe v wade or remove a women's right to choose an abortion.

Evidently you don't have a clue what your party is prosing against women. Her body will no longer be her own  after they have probed her womb, then old white men want to put her or any doctor in jail that performs an abortion for **** oor incest.

No, I do have a clue what those who share my ideological views wants in regards to women and abortion.  I am also well versed in republican and democrat views.


Which portion of what you posted represents the views of those who share my ideological views?


I stand by my post above.

[clistensprechen]

Well, you have shown that you're not all that well versed in Democrat positions, actually...  :popcorn:

[Woody]

Well, you have shown that you're not all that well versed in Democrat positions, actually...  :popcorn:

I know you are basically lazy snookums but I will ask anyway.  Name a position and then post my supporting comments that backup your comment.

[clistensprechen]

Woody's Rabbit Hole.

[Woody]

Woody's Rabbit Hole.

There ya have it.  Nuttin' from snookums.


Can we return to the discussion or would rather discuss me?  I am down for either.

[clistensprechen]

I'm pressed for time today; if I wasn't, I'd post more.  Raincheck, pookie.  :wuv:

[kentay]

Cool.  There is nothing in kentay's cut and paste that will overturn roe v wade or remove a women's right to choose an abortion.

Evidently you don't have a clue what your party is prosing against women. Her body will no longer be her own  after they have probed her womb, then old white men want to put her or any doctor in jail that performs an abortion for **** oor incest.

No, I do have a clue what those who share my ideological views wants in regards to women and abortion.  I am also well versed in republican and democrat views.


Which portion of what you posted represents the views of those who share my ideological views?


I stand by my post above.

Your vote for them will signifies your tactical approval of their position. Besides I have never, no never saw you speak out against their views, as a matter of fact you say nothing or offer any criticism about anything in your party plank or what Romney/Ryan does or say or votes on. You are a good yes man. kentay. 

[Woody]

I'm pressed for time today; if I wasn't, I'd post more.  Raincheck, pookie.  :wuv:

No problem pumpkin.  Back at at ya.    :wuv:


For real!

[clistensprechen]

[Woody]

Cool.  There is nothing in kentay's cut and paste that will overturn roe v wade or remove a women's right to choose an abortion.

Evidently you don't have a clue what your party is prosing against women. Her body will no longer be her own  after they have probed her womb, then old white men want to put her or any doctor in jail that performs an abortion for **** oor incest.

No, I do have a clue what those who share my ideological views wants in regards to women and abortion.  I am also well versed in republican and democrat views.


Which portion of what you posted represents the views of those who share my ideological views?


I stand by my post above.

Your vote for them will signifies your tactical approval of their position. Besides I have never, no never saw you speak out against their views, as a matter of fact you say nothing or offer any criticism about anything in your party plank or what Romney/Ryan does or say or votes on. You are a good yes man. kentay. 

Actually  kentay, you just choose to suffer from selective memory.  My position HAS ALWAYS BEEN similiar to Ron Paul's.   The federal government has no authority to be involved in the abortion issue.  Being pragmatic I have always supported Roe V wade and have never supported overturning it or removing a women's right to choose.  Do you recall thru your age induced haze how many times I posted I was grudgingly pro choice? 


I should have realized that a legimate, adult like conversation. Is still not something you are willing to participate in.


Back to the rabbit hole with you.  Oh, by the way, great job at running away from our conversation.