occupy

[donni]

http://www.adbusters.org/magazine/103/a-new-way-of-being.html

[clistensprechen]

Well, all the big journalists work for corporations traded on Wall Street, and that's the short answer.

And what might get this board and its host into legal trouble is reproducing the entire text of somebody else's composition without compliance to Fair Use portion of copyright law if you're without formal permission to reproduce the article, or without posting your formal permission to reproduce the article.

If this author has granted permission to reproduce the article, I request that you post a link to that permission.  Thanks.

[Ted S]

As Pearl S. Buck put it in her award winning novel, The Good Earth; Rami Shamir has too much idle time.

[donni]

Well, all the big journalists work for corporations traded on Wall Street, and that's the short answer.

And what might get this board and its host into legal trouble is reproducing the entire text of somebody else's composition without compliance to Fair Use portion of copyright law if you're without formal permission to reproduce the article, or without posting your formal permission to reproduce the article.

If this author has granted permission to reproduce the article, I request that you post a link to that permission.  Thanks.

well, i had no idea i needed permission to copy/paste anything off the internet-since when? i attributed it to the author -i thought that was good enough-no?

[clistensprechen]

As Pearl S. Buck put it in her award winning novel, The Good Earth; Rami Shamir has too much idle time.

Rami Shamir's time is overshadowed by the mental thumb-twiddling engaged in by any given member of any given con think tank.

[clistensprechen]

Well, all the big journalists work for corporations traded on Wall Street, and that's the short answer.

And what might get this board and its host into legal trouble is reproducing the entire text of somebody else's composition without compliance to Fair Use portion of copyright law if you're without formal permission to reproduce the article, or without posting your formal permission to reproduce the article.

If this author has granted permission to reproduce the article, I request that you post a link to that permission.  Thanks.

well, i had no idea i needed permission to copy/paste anything off the internet-since when? i attributed it to the author -i thought that was good enough-no?

It used to be good enough and itty bitty boards can still get away with it, I guess...but...there are increasing numbers of copyright cops out and about and it's not something that has ever been up to snuff especially on the Internet.  What Fair Use requires online is putting in quotes only the portion of an article you wish to discuss and provide a link to the original author's website where the full text of the article resides.  Full text reproduction = reproduction without permission unless you did get permission and post that permission with the article.

[donni]

Well, all the big journalists work for corporations traded on Wall Street, and that's the short answer.

And what might get this board and its host into legal trouble is reproducing the entire text of somebody else's composition without compliance to Fair Use portion of copyright law if you're without formal permission to reproduce the article, or without posting your formal permission to reproduce the article.

If this author has granted permission to reproduce the article, I request that you post a link to that permission.  Thanks.

well, i had no idea i needed permission to copy/paste anything off the internet-since when? i attributed it to the author -i thought that was good enough-no?

It used to be good enough and itty bitty boards can still get away with it, I guess...but...there are increasing numbers of copyright cops out and about and it's not something that has ever been up to snuff especially on the Internet.  What Fair Use requires online is putting in quotes only the portion of an article you wish to discuss and provide a link to the original author's website where the full text of the article resides.  Full text reproduction = reproduction without permission unless you did get permission and post that permission with the article.

ok-i fixed it, i think-better?

[wbcoleman]

So what happened to Occupy this summer?  Months ago I was told they'd pop up again when the weather got better.  Maybe this is just a dead issue.

[RWE]

A bunch of middle-class socialist brats being played for fools by Obama and his Wall Street cronies.

[Woody]

So what happened to Occupy this summer?  Months ago I was told they'd pop up again when the weather got better.  Maybe this is just a dead issue.

They lost their corporate sponsorship.

[clistensprechen]

Well, all the big journalists work for corporations traded on Wall Street, and that's the short answer.

And what might get this board and its host into legal trouble is reproducing the entire text of somebody else's composition without compliance to Fair Use portion of copyright law if you're without formal permission to reproduce the article, or without posting your formal permission to reproduce the article.

If this author has granted permission to reproduce the article, I request that you post a link to that permission.  Thanks.

well, i had no idea i needed permission to copy/paste anything off the internet-since when? i attributed it to the author -i thought that was good enough-no?

It used to be good enough and itty bitty boards can still get away with it, I guess...but...there are increasing numbers of copyright cops out and about and it's not something that has ever been up to snuff especially on the Internet.  What Fair Use requires online is putting in quotes only the portion of an article you wish to discuss and provide a link to the original author's website where the full text of the article resides.  Full text reproduction = reproduction without permission unless you did get permission and post that permission with the article.

ok-i fixed it, i think-better?

Yup! That's definitely regulation. Thank you very much.

[clistensprechen]

So what happened to Occupy this summer?  Months ago I was told they'd pop up again when the weather got better.  Maybe this is just a dead issue.

Nope. They're all over Facebook and Twitter, at the very least.  I do believe your side mentions "lame stream media" for a reason.

[wbcoleman]

So what happened to Occupy this summer?  Months ago I was told they'd pop up again when the weather got better.  Maybe this is just a dead issue.

Nope. They're all over Facebook and Twitter, at the very least.  I do believe your side mentions "lame stream media" for a reason.

"All over Facebook and Twitter?"  Sounds good to me!

[donni]

what do u want them to do, coleman-beat someone up? give u **** a reason to keep attacking them? because as this author said- they r no match for bullhorns, billy clubs, and guns. they r good people who abhor violence for the most part. but u guys are all jiggy wid it, aincha? neanderthals! might STILL don't make u right!

[wbcoleman]

what do u want them to do, coleman-beat someone up? give u **** a reason to keep attacking them? because as this author said- they r no match for bullhorns, billy clubs, and guns. they r good people who abhor violence for the most part. but u guys are all jiggy wid it, aincha? neanderthals! might STILL don't make u right!

I think they could all use a beer.   :cheers: