Mia Love: Up-and-Coming GOP Superstar

[wbcoleman]

The Republican answer to O!

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/gop-house-candidate-mia-love-impresses-rnc-crowd-with-fiery-speech/

And she's Mormon!

[donni]

why post this agitprop, coleman? lol!

[wbcoleman]

why post this agitprop, coleman? lol!

What do you consider agitprop?  The link took you to a relatively straightforward news story with a video of Mia's speech delivered to the RNC.  I mean, if it offers a favorable view of a Republican, does that make it agitprop?  In your view?

[donni]

no- what do YOU consider agitrop? i asked first. you 'people' never answer, u just fling poo like the monkeys in the zoo.

[Woody]

no- what do YOU consider agitrop? i asked first. you 'people' never answer, u just fling poo like the monkeys in the zoo.

I must call foul.  You may not use the word monkey on this thread.  On a Romney thread you are allowed. 


Donni, what do you think of Mia Love? 

[wbcoleman]

no- what do YOU consider agitrop? i asked first. you 'people' never answer, u just fling poo like the monkeys in the zoo.

Your question was, "Why post this agitprop, coleman?"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agitprop

[donni]

no-i asked on another thread that u have apparently run from-what source you would or wouldn't consider agitprop. u never answered you just pop up to ask ME more stupid questions. forget you. when u answer me, i'll think about answering you, cowards.

[wbcoleman]

no-i asked on another thread that u have apparently run from-what source you would or wouldn't consider agitprop. u never answered you just pop up to ask ME more stupid questions. forget you. when u answer me, i'll think about answering you, cowards.

Didn't notice it, sorry.

Look at the link, I'll be happy to answer questions.

[donni]

that could apply to every mainstream news/opinion publication out there. so i should accept only what u accept as pure factual information?

no, i accept what makes sense in the big picture. it doesn't make sense to believe the u.s. when it says it must use its might for humanitarian or defense causes when we see can see the hypocrisy and b.s. for the resource/power grab it is.

[wbcoleman]

that could apply to every mainstream news/opinion publication out there. so i should accept only what u accept as pure factual information?

no, i accept what makes sense in the big picture. it doesn't make sense to believe the u.s. when it says it must use its might for humanitarian or defense causes when we see can see the hypocrisy and b.s. for the resource/power grab it is.

The relevant quote is this:

"Agitpropwith an explicitly political message."

If you post something from, say, thinkprogress, it has an explicitly political message.   If I post an opinion from hotair, it most likely has an explicitly political message.  If either of us posts a news article from The New York Times, it may contain political bias [left!], but it probably isn't agitprop because the political message is implicit.

Okay?

[donni]

so let me get this straight -you will believe a lie as long as it is only implied? haha!

[wbcoleman]

so let me get this straight -you will believe a lie as long as it is only implied? haha!

You're having trouble getting this straight.

[Woody]

I notice kentay has learned to restrain himself.  Back when bush appointed Colin Powell and Condi Rice he described them as house slaves, uncle toms, and aunt jemimas.

[wbcoleman]

I notice kentay has learned to restrain himself.  Back when bush appointed Colin Powell and Condi Rice he described them as house slaves, uncle toms, and aunt jemimas.

Dubya refused to EVAH appoint a white Secretary of State.. I guess O fixed that.

[Woody]

I notice kentay has learned to restrain himself.  Back when bush appointed Colin Powell and Condi Rice he described them as house slaves, uncle toms, and aunt jemimas.

Dubya refused to EVAH appoint a white Secretary of State.. I guess O fixed that.

Hillary was an affirmative action hire.