Fox Snags Dennis the Menace!

[wbcoleman]

Fox News hires Dennis Kucinich as analyst
JAN 17 2013 09:47 AM | by Associated Press

http://insidetv.ew.com/2013/01/17/dennis-kucinich-fox/

[Ted S]

Kucinich has been an occasional guest on O'Reilly's show.  He's a pretty good fit for FOX.  Solidly liberal but unlike many of the MSNBC hosts for instance, he's not offended by conservative views to the point where he becomes uncivil.

I don't know if you guys are aware but Kucinich definitely married-up in the looks department.  His wife is a young and tall redhead. Really quite striking. (My Musberger moment)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Kucinich

[wbcoleman]

Dennis once revealed that he ran for President in order to pick up babes.  And it worked!

[Ted S]

Dennis once revealed that he ran for President in order to pick up babes.  And it worked!

Sure did.  And as long as we're at it, no story about Kucinich would be complete without including his UFO sighting:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,306616,00.html

[clistensprechen]

Dennis is in, and Palin is out.

Fox is still a den of nutjobs all the same.  It's gonna take more than that to convince ME to watch.

[Don Houston]

Fox is to the Republicans, what MSNBC is to the Democrats

[clistensprechen]

Nope. Fox is Bedtime Stories for Bonzos. MSNBC has an impressive research department, not the least part of that is Wall Street Journal polls, a Murdoch product that Foxheads decry only because it works with NBC on polling. Go figure.

[wbcoleman]

Nope. Fox is Bedtime Stories for Bonzos. MSNBC has an impressive research department, not the least part of that is Wall Street Journal polls, a Murdoch product that Foxheads decry only because it works with NBC on polling. Go figure.

This is insane.  MSLSD makes Fox look non-partisan.

[Ted S]

MSNBC has an impressive research department...

I don't know about MSNBC as a whole but Maddow does for sure.  It's just too bad that they concentrate all of their effort investigating one side of the political spectrum and ignore anything that doesn't move promote their leftist agenda.

[wbcoleman]

MSNBC has an impressive research department...

I don't know about MSNBC as a whole but Maddow does for sure.  It's just too bad that they concentrate all of their effort investigating one side of the political spectrum and ignore anything that doesn't move promote their leftist agenda.

"All the news that fits!"

[clistensprechen]

Nope. Fox is Bedtime Stories for Bonzos. MSNBC has an impressive research department, not the least part of that is Wall Street Journal polls, a Murdoch product that Foxheads decry only because it works with NBC on polling. Go figure.

This is insane.  MSLSD makes Fox look non-partisan.

...to an insane rightwingnut, that is.  Facts are facts, and Fox doesn't do research on facts. MSNBC does.

[wbcoleman]

Nope. Fox is Bedtime Stories for Bonzos. MSNBC has an impressive research department, not the least part of that is Wall Street Journal polls, a Murdoch product that Foxheads decry only because it works with NBC on polling. Go figure.

This is insane.  MSLSD makes Fox look non-partisan.

...to an insane rightwingnut, that is.  Facts are facts, and Fox doesn't do research on facts. MSNBC does.

Especially Ed and the Right Reverend Al!   

[clistensprechen]

Oh hell, Ed sucks. No argument there. No argument from Ted S. either, I'll wager. Couldn't stand O'Donnell either, for that matter, but then his research got better. Larry still sounds screechy in my ear, but his research has improved and I'll betcha it's the MSNBC research department that made the improvement.

Bottom line--it's more about the research department than it is about the talking heads.

[Ted S]

No argument from Ted S. either, I'll wager.

Most of the MSNBC hosts are pathetic.  Maddow does seem to do her research but as I said, her staff will completely ignore important news that is unflattering for democrats while they focus like a laser on some trivial fact that makes conservatives look bad.

I can watch most of the FOX hosts but only because I generally agree with their views.  But when I put my impartial observer hat on I really dislike O'Reilly and especially Hannity.

[wbcoleman]

Oh hell, Ed sucks. No argument there. No argument from Ted S. either, I'll wager. Couldn't stand O'Donnell either, for that matter, but then his research got better. Larry still sounds screechy in my ear, but his research has improved and I'll betcha it's the MSNBC research department that made the improvement.

Bottom line--it's more about the research department than it is about the talking heads.

I guess it was the vaunted MSLSD research department which discovered the tingle running up Tweety's leg!