You want to be ruled by full-time career politicians and you want to ban the teaching of anything which, in your opinion, lacks a factual basis. Isn't stuff like that a recipe for tyranny?
Not at all Coleman, I'm not against the teaching of anything as long as it is not thought as fact without supporting evidence.
Politicians would still have to be elected, just once they had served they could not enter public sector professions again.
I'm still not understanding this.
YOU provide a list of unacceptable subjects; that is, subjects which you regard as lacking supporting evidence?