Gnosisquest,
You can't prove that God does not exist, can you. You can't explain how all the matter in the universe came into existence, can you. You have faith that it just appeared out of nothing. You blindly accept that notion without question or proof. But you feel that you have the authority to impose your superstition on others.
It is impossible to prove a negative; the person arguing is the one that must furnish proof. After 1400 years of forgeries, excuses and distortions there is no solid evidence any of the dogma is correct; there is however a plethora of evidence against it being of Judaic origin.
If a person does not know how something came about it only proves that the person has something to learn, not that old superstitions have merit.
Can you say with any certainty that there is no God? No. All you can say with certainty is that you do not believe there is a God. You could be wrong. Belief in God is then equal to not believing in God if neither can be proven. They are both leaps of faith. You can teach your leap of faith as fact in a classroom but then you want to deny others from teaching their leap of faith as a fact in a church.
I did not say with certainty that there is no God only that the Judaic material is bunk. If there is a God he ain't it.
In other words; what I am saying is that when you teach something teach as true only that for which there is evidence. Everything else is speculation and the Sumerian deities of 10 000 years ago is equally valid for study as any of the others. Just because a set of beliefs are popular does not mean there is any merit to them.