Biden Will Attempt to Disrupt GOP Convention

[clistensprechen]

Indeed, kentay.  Cons were going nuts on Twitter with the hashtag #ObamaSpellingBee, and I was joining in with such Tweets as

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  S-P-O-R-T-S A-R-E-N-A"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  W-A-T-E-R M-A-I-N-S"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  F-I-R-E D-E-P-A-R-T-M-E-N-T-S"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  R-O-A-D-S"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  B-R-I-D-G-E-S"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  I-N-T-E-R-S-T-A-T-E H-I-G-H-W-A-Y-S"  ...etc.

I see that you are happy to join kentay in attempting to divert the thread from a discussion of Biden's shenanigans.  Am I to take it that the two of you don't have any real defense of them to offer but, as loyal bots, you need to divert?

I was talking to kentay, thank you. But now that you've asked so politely, I'll point out that Ron Paul is going to Tampa, too, and yet I haven't heard anybody whine about Ron Paul disrupting the Tampa convention.  You just have it in for Biden because it's a free country for Ron Paul but not for Joe Biden. 

[NEM]

I will not watch any of the repubiCLAN convention but I can hardly wait for the democratic one.... and glad that the democrats come AFTER the republiCLAN convention which will enable them to pick all of the speeches apart, item by item.  I hope that nothing is held back and they take advantage of the national stage they will be on.  THey need to remember just one thing............NICE GUYS FINISH LAST

[wbcoleman]

Indeed, kentay.  Cons were going nuts on Twitter with the hashtag #ObamaSpellingBee, and I was joining in with such Tweets as

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  S-P-O-R-T-S A-R-E-N-A"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  W-A-T-E-R M-A-I-N-S"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  F-I-R-E D-E-P-A-R-T-M-E-N-T-S"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  R-O-A-D-S"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  B-R-I-D-G-E-S"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  I-N-T-E-R-S-T-A-T-E H-I-G-H-W-A-Y-S"  ...etc.

I see that you are happy to join kentay in attempting to divert the thread from a discussion of Biden's shenanigans.  Am I to take it that the two of you don't have any real defense of them to offer but, as loyal bots, you need to divert?

I was talking to kentay, thank you. But now that you've asked so politely, I'll point out that Ron Paul is going to Tampa, too, and yet I haven't heard anybody whine about Ron Paul disrupting the Tampa convention.  You just have it in for Biden because it's a free country for Ron Paul but not for Joe Biden. 

Will security around Ron Paul disrupt the convention?  And is Ron Paul a representative of the opposition party?  [Or, was he can candidate for the Republican nomination?]

[clistensprechen]

Indeed, kentay.  Cons were going nuts on Twitter with the hashtag #ObamaSpellingBee, and I was joining in with such Tweets as

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  S-P-O-R-T-S A-R-E-N-A"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  W-A-T-E-R M-A-I-N-S"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  F-I-R-E D-E-P-A-R-T-M-E-N-T-S"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  R-O-A-D-S"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  B-R-I-D-G-E-S"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  I-N-T-E-R-S-T-A-T-E H-I-G-H-W-A-Y-S"  ...etc.

I see that you are happy to join kentay in attempting to divert the thread from a discussion of Biden's shenanigans.  Am I to take it that the two of you don't have any real defense of them to offer but, as loyal bots, you need to divert?

I was talking to kentay, thank you. But now that you've asked so politely, I'll point out that Ron Paul is going to Tampa, too, and yet I haven't heard anybody whine about Ron Paul disrupting the Tampa convention.  You just have it in for Biden because it's a free country for Ron Paul but not for Joe Biden. 

Will security around Ron Paul disrupt the convention?  And is Ron Paul a representative of the opposition party?  [Or, was he can candidate for the Republican nomination?]

Was he can wut?

You'll have to ask Ron Paul directly, I can't speak for his campaign except to say that his is a GOP insurgency given his delegate count.  But you'll have to ask him in English. 

[wbcoleman]

Indeed, kentay.  Cons were going nuts on Twitter with the hashtag #ObamaSpellingBee, and I was joining in with such Tweets as

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  S-P-O-R-T-S A-R-E-N-A"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  W-A-T-E-R M-A-I-N-S"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  F-I-R-E D-E-P-A-R-T-M-E-N-T-S"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  R-O-A-D-S"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  B-R-I-D-G-E-S"

"#ObamaSpellingBee Spell "didn't build that".  I-N-T-E-R-S-T-A-T-E H-I-G-H-W-A-Y-S"  ...etc.

I see that you are happy to join kentay in attempting to divert the thread from a discussion of Biden's shenanigans.  Am I to take it that the two of you don't have any real defense of them to offer but, as loyal bots, you need to divert?

I was talking to kentay, thank you. But now that you've asked so politely, I'll point out that Ron Paul is going to Tampa, too, and yet I haven't heard anybody whine about Ron Paul disrupting the Tampa convention.  You just have it in for Biden because it's a free country for Ron Paul but not for Joe Biden. 

Will security around Ron Paul disrupt the convention?  And is Ron Paul a representative of the opposition party?  [Or, was he can candidate for the Republican nomination?]

Was he can wut?

You'll have to ask Ron Paul directly, I can't speak for his campaign except to say that his is a GOP insurgency given his delegate count.  But you'll have to ask him in English. 

You're the one who brought up Ron Paul, who is otherwise an irrelevancy.  Why did you bring up Ron Paul?  Are you actually EMBARRASSED by Biden's shenanigans and, being a good O-bot, feel the need to divert?

[kentay]

Maybe God will disrupt the GOP Convention  according to Pat Robertson philosophy on how God feels and thinks. . If I was a young attractive woman I would be terrified about the possibility of  Republican men taking over the levers of power, with no controls on them. Because these Republican Prehistoric men want to keep a woman barefoot and pregnant with the possibility of having to carry a **** though incest to term.  It looks to me like Republican men want to punish women for getting pregnant because they are just too attractive a temptation for Republican men to deal with. kentay
 

[wbcoleman]

Maybe God will disrupt the GOP Convention  according to Pat Robertson philosophy on how God feels and thinks. . If I was a young attractive woman I would be terrified about the possibility of  Republican men taking over the levers of power, with no controls on them. Because these Republican Prehistoric men want to keep a woman barefoot and pregnant with the possibility of having to carry a **** though incest to term.  It looks to me like Republican men want to punish women for getting pregnant because they are just too attractive a temptation for Republican men to deal with. kentay

Abstracting from the nonsense about "barefoot and pregnant with the possibility of having to carry a **** though incest" and the especially loopy "Republican men want to punish women for getting pregnant because they are just too attractive a temptation for Republican men to deal with," how exactly did attractive young women suffer during the Bush Administration, eh?

What exactly is the philosophical argument for banning abortion but excepting **** and incest?

On this one, no argument from me.

[kentay]

Why don't you have a realistic talk with a few women you  know and others you don't know. Show them what your party say first about them and then have a open and free discussion, don't be afraid.. kentay

[Woody]

Why don't you have a realistic talk with a few women you  know and others you don't know. Show them what your party say first about them and then have a open and free discussion, don't be afraid.. kentay

Hi kentay.  The democrat party claims to support women, have their back, treat the as equals and with respect. 


Do you find it odd that the keynote speaker at BoA field will be William "Slick Willie" Clinton.  Kinda like  gettin' you to speak about race relations at the NAACP.

[clistensprechen]

I brought up Ron Paul because he has, for decades, been considered a Republican outlier and disruptive, hence his moniker "Doctor No"...and also erstwhile founder of the original Tea Party before the crazies took over, and there's no love lost between establishment Republican leaders and the Tea Party as it now exists.

Ron Paul's primary strategy of co-opting delegates is also considered disruptive by the Republican Party.

And while Republicans are making much of Joe Biden, they're going to let Paul slip in under the radar with his planned calamities.  Or are they?  The Republican Party has already swept Dubya and Akin under their Big Rug (forget the Big Tent), so I guess Ron Paul can be shoved under there too, huh.

[wbcoleman]

Why don't you have a realistic talk with a few women you  know and others you don't know. Show them what your party say first about them and then have a open and free discussion, don't be afraid.. kentay

Abstracting from the nonsense about "barefoot and pregnant with the possibility of having to carry a **** though incest" and the especially loopy "Republican men want to punish women for getting pregnant because they are just too attractive a temptation for Republican men to deal with," how exactly did attractive young women suffer during the Bush Administration, eh?

What exactly is the philosophical argument for banning abortion but excepting **** and incest?

[wbcoleman]

I brought up Ron Paul because he has, for decades, been considered a Republican outlier and disruptive, hence his moniker "Doctor No"...and also erstwhile founder of the original Tea Party before the crazies took over, and there's no love lost between establishment Republican leaders and the Tea Party as it now exists.

Ron Paul's primary strategy of co-opting delegates is also considered disruptive by the Republican Party.

And while Republicans are making much of Joe Biden, they're going to let Paul slip in under the radar with his planned calamities.  Or are they?  The Republican Party has already swept Dubya and Akin under their Big Rug (forget the Big Tent), so I guess Ron Paul can be shoved under there too, huh.

Ron Paul was a legitimate candidate for the Republican nomination and remains today a longstanding Republican officeholder.  I think he's a whack but so what?  Your comparing him being at the GOP Convention with Joe Biden's shenanigans is absurd.

[clistensprechen]

I brought up Ron Paul because he has, for decades, been considered a Republican outlier and disruptive, hence his moniker "Doctor No"...and also erstwhile founder of the original Tea Party before the crazies took over, and there's no love lost between establishment Republican leaders and the Tea Party as it now exists.

Ron Paul's primary strategy of co-opting delegates is also considered disruptive by the Republican Party.

And while Republicans are making much of Joe Biden, they're going to let Paul slip in under the radar with his planned calamities.  Or are they?  The Republican Party has already swept Dubya and Akin under their Big Rug (forget the Big Tent), so I guess Ron Paul can be shoved under there too, huh.

Ron Paul was a legitimate candidate for the Republican nomination and remains today a longstanding Republican officeholder.  I think he's a whack but so what?  Your comparing him being at the GOP Convention with Joe Biden's shenanigans is absurd.

And your characterization of Doctor No is overly generous. He's been regarded as disruptive by his own party for about as long as he's held office, but like Akin's position, he is where he is only because of his constituents.  Not to mention that he's got more national support from rogue Republicans than Akin ever had.

[Woody]

I brought up Ron Paul because he has, for decades, been considered a Republican outlier and disruptive, hence his moniker "Doctor No"...and also erstwhile founder of the original Tea Party before the crazies took over, and there's no love lost between establishment Republican leaders and the Tea Party as it now exists.

Ron Paul's primary strategy of co-opting delegates is also considered disruptive by the Republican Party.

And while Republicans are making much of Joe Biden, they're going to let Paul slip in under the radar with his planned calamities.  Or are they?  The Republican Party has already swept Dubya and Akin under their Big Rug (forget the Big Tent), so I guess Ron Paul can be shoved under there too, huh.

Ron Paul was a legitimate candidate for the Republican nomination and remains today a longstanding Republican officeholder.  I think he's a whack but so what?  Your comparing him being at the GOP Convention with Joe Biden's shenanigans is absurd.

And your characterization of Doctor No is overly generous. He's been regarded as disruptive by his own party for about as long as he's held office, but like Akin's position, he is where he is only because of his constituents.  Not to mention that he's got more national support from rogue Republicans than Akin ever had.

Here is what is going to happen regardless of you Ron Paul hysteria.  Romney/Ryan will accept the nomination with little or no disruption from Paul no matter how much you are hoping for it.

[clistensprechen]

I brought up Ron Paul because he has, for decades, been considered a Republican outlier and disruptive, hence his moniker "Doctor No"...and also erstwhile founder of the original Tea Party before the crazies took over, and there's no love lost between establishment Republican leaders and the Tea Party as it now exists.

Ron Paul's primary strategy of co-opting delegates is also considered disruptive by the Republican Party.

And while Republicans are making much of Joe Biden, they're going to let Paul slip in under the radar with his planned calamities.  Or are they?  The Republican Party has already swept Dubya and Akin under their Big Rug (forget the Big Tent), so I guess Ron Paul can be shoved under there too, huh.

Ron Paul was a legitimate candidate for the Republican nomination and remains today a longstanding Republican officeholder.  I think he's a whack but so what?  Your comparing him being at the GOP Convention with Joe Biden's shenanigans is absurd.

And your characterization of Doctor No is overly generous. He's been regarded as disruptive by his own party for about as long as he's held office, but like Akin's position, he is where he is only because of his constituents.  Not to mention that he's got more national support from rogue Republicans than Akin ever had.

Here is what is going to happen regardless of you Ron Paul hysteria.  Romney/Ryan will accept the nomination with little or no disruption from Paul no matter how much you are hoping for it.

So you know for a fact how many delegates Ron Paul has, huh.
You also know he's doing his own convention in Tampa, right?
I'm on Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty mailing list...and you are too, right?