Author Topic: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo  (Read 532 times)

Offline clistensprechen

  • High Lord Umpire
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *******
  • Posts: 1460
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #30 on: September 11, 2012, 06:33:40 pm »
Well said, actually.

Do you happen to know what this is referring to?
As a general statement, it stands without needing a reference.


So Clara obviously feels that storming a US EMBASSY, tearing down our flag, and replacing it with a black flag because US Egyptian Christians made a movie they don't like is perfectly acceptable.

I'm not sure that she knows anything about the movie.

And judging from her content she does not have the urge to find out.
The circumstance doesn't render the statement false.  Sorry.

The statement is in reaction to the the activities in Cairo and Libya.  Can we glean from your position that you agree with the administration that the fault lie with the Egyptian Christians who are producing the movie in the US,

Can she seriously believe that an assault on the U.S. Embassy is justified?  Actually, why not, O's embassy itself seems to think it is!
I don't see security detail.  Show me where security staff is. Show me the guns.






Coleman, she is diverting.  Answer this question.  Are you saying you agree with the administration that blaming the Egyptian Christians for this is the proper response?
That isn't a question posed by the statement--that's something you invented.

Offline Woody

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1184
  • Location: Anywhere
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #31 on: September 11, 2012, 06:37:00 pm »
Well said, actually.

Do you happen to know what this is referring to?
As a general statement, it stands without needing a reference.


So Clara obviously feels that storming a US EMBASSY, tearing down our flag, and replacing it with a black flag because US Egyptian Christians made a movie they don't like is perfectly acceptable.

I'm not sure that she knows anything about the movie.

And judging from her content she does not have the urge to find out.
The circumstance doesn't render the statement false.  Sorry.

The statement is in reaction to the the activities in Cairo and Libya.  Can we glean from your position that you agree with the administration that the fault lie with the Egyptian Christians who are producing the movie in the US,

Can she seriously believe that an assault on the U.S. Embassy is justified?  Actually, why not, O's embassy itself seems to think it is!
I don't see security detail.  Show me where security staff is. Show me the guns.






Coleman, she is diverting.  Answer this question.  Are you saying you agree with the administration that blaming the Egyptian Christians for this is the proper response?
That isn't a question posed by the statement--that's something you invented.




Bullshit. That is exactly what the statement is saying.  Where did they condemn the actions of the mob?


You are again parsing, trying to treat the statement out of context.  Because you are clueless to the events that led up to the statement.  I refuse to play your Save Clara's ass game.



A reminder for kentay:
I fully support going back to ALL, that says ALL THE CLINTON TAX and spend policies that led to the economic boom in the second half of the 90's.

Offline clistensprechen

  • High Lord Umpire
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *******
  • Posts: 1460
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #32 on: September 11, 2012, 06:39:58 pm »
They condemned the actions of the mob because the descriptor in the statement fits the mob. MAN, what a dense lot cons are.

So--where is security hiding?

Offline Woody

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1184
  • Location: Anywhere
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #33 on: September 11, 2012, 06:41:38 pm »
They condemned the actions of the mob because the descriptor in the statement fits the mob. MAN, what a dense lot cons are.


I also linked to the armed mob story where the set fire to the consulate.  Kinda ignored that, didn't you.


Save your ass babe.
A reminder for kentay:
I fully support going back to ALL, that says ALL THE CLINTON TAX and spend policies that led to the economic boom in the second half of the 90's.

Offline clistensprechen

  • High Lord Umpire
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *******
  • Posts: 1460
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #34 on: September 11, 2012, 06:43:54 pm »
They condemned the actions of the mob because the descriptor in the statement fits the mob. MAN, what a dense lot cons are.


I also linked to the armed mob story where the set fire to the consulate.  Kinda ignored that, didn't you.


Save your ass babe.

Don't have to. Where's security? Where are the guns?

Offline wbcoleman

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #35 on: September 11, 2012, 06:44:56 pm »
They condemned the actions of the mob because the descriptor in the statement fits the mob. MAN, what a dense lot cons are.

So--where is security hiding?

Where?  They never mention the mob!
Zionism is the National Liberation Movement of the Jewish People.

Offline Woody

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1184
  • Location: Anywhere
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #36 on: September 11, 2012, 06:46:13 pm »
They condemned the actions of the mob because the descriptor in the statement fits the mob. MAN, what a dense lot cons are.


I also linked to the armed mob story where the set fire to the consulate.  Kinda ignored that, didn't you.


Save your ass babe.

Don't have to. Where's security? Where are the guns?


Read the story I linked to.  You called me dense?  Goddam, she yells and **** about things and when you provide it she ignores it.


PS.  Dense one, the poll you wanted a link to is on the other thread.  Gonna run from that as well?




A reminder for kentay:
I fully support going back to ALL, that says ALL THE CLINTON TAX and spend policies that led to the economic boom in the second half of the 90's.

Offline clistensprechen

  • High Lord Umpire
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *******
  • Posts: 1460
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #37 on: September 11, 2012, 06:51:25 pm »
They condemned the actions of the mob because the descriptor in the statement fits the mob. MAN, what a dense lot cons are.

So--where is security hiding?

Where?  They never mention the mob!
Security handles mobs. Never heard of that, huh. People just normally waltz into embassies without guns and cause mayhem at will, huh. Bollocks.

Offline Woody

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1184
  • Location: Anywhere
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #38 on: September 11, 2012, 06:52:59 pm »
They condemned the actions of the mob because the descriptor in the statement fits the mob. MAN, what a dense lot cons are.

So--where is security hiding?

Where?  They never mention the mob!
Security handles mobs. Never heard of that, huh. People just normally waltz into embassies without guns and cause mayhem at will, huh. Bollocks.


Still ignoring the Libya story I see.  Additionally, are you saying that the story about a mob storming the embassy is not truthful? 









A reminder for kentay:
I fully support going back to ALL, that says ALL THE CLINTON TAX and spend policies that led to the economic boom in the second half of the 90's.

Offline clistensprechen

  • High Lord Umpire
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *******
  • Posts: 1460
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #39 on: September 11, 2012, 06:54:46 pm »
They condemned the actions of the mob because the descriptor in the statement fits the mob. MAN, what a dense lot cons are.


I also linked to the armed mob story where the set fire to the consulate.  Kinda ignored that, didn't you.


Save your ass babe.
Benghazi isn't in Egypt, sweetcheeks.

Offline wbcoleman

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #40 on: September 11, 2012, 06:57:03 pm »
They condemned the actions of the mob because the descriptor in the statement fits the mob. MAN, what a dense lot cons are.

So--where is security hiding?

Where?  They never mention the mob!
Security handles mobs. Never heard of that, huh. People just normally waltz into embassies without guns and cause mayhem at will, huh. Bollocks.

Where?  They never mention the mob!
Zionism is the National Liberation Movement of the Jewish People.

Offline wbcoleman

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #41 on: September 11, 2012, 06:57:50 pm »
They condemned the actions of the mob because the descriptor in the statement fits the mob. MAN, what a dense lot cons are.


I also linked to the armed mob story where the set fire to the consulate.  Kinda ignored that, didn't you.


Save your ass babe.
Benghazi isn't in Egypt, sweetcheeks.

He said LIBYA, sweetcheeks!
Zionism is the National Liberation Movement of the Jewish People.

Offline clistensprechen

  • High Lord Umpire
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *******
  • Posts: 1460
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #42 on: September 11, 2012, 06:58:46 pm »
They condemned the actions of the mob because the descriptor in the statement fits the mob. MAN, what a dense lot cons are.

So--where is security hiding?

Where?  They never mention the mob!
Security handles mobs. Never heard of that, huh. People just normally waltz into embassies without guns and cause mayhem at will, huh. Bollocks.

Where?  They never mention the mob!
So?
Apply for the job of Embassy Spokes-writer then.

The statement release is nonetheless well stated.

Offline Woody

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1184
  • Location: Anywhere
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #43 on: September 11, 2012, 06:59:50 pm »
They condemned the actions of the mob because the descriptor in the statement fits the mob. MAN, what a dense lot cons are.


I also linked to the armed mob story where the set fire to the consulate.  Kinda ignored that, didn't you.


Save your ass babe.
Benghazi isn't in Egypt, sweetcheeks.


Here you go   Read the **** story prior to make dumbass comments.  Pay attention to where SECURITY cleared the building in expectation of the mob, where 2000 people gathered, and where WARNING SHOTS were fired.  Next time you want to start **** get your facts straight and do your own research for once.



http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/09/11/warning-shots-fired-as-cairo-protesters-storm-u-s-embassy-walls/


A reminder for kentay:
I fully support going back to ALL, that says ALL THE CLINTON TAX and spend policies that led to the economic boom in the second half of the 90's.

Offline wbcoleman

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #44 on: September 11, 2012, 07:06:39 pm »
They condemned the actions of the mob because the descriptor in the statement fits the mob. MAN, what a dense lot cons are.

So--where is security hiding?

Where?  They never mention the mob!
Security handles mobs. Never heard of that, huh. People just normally waltz into embassies without guns and cause mayhem at will, huh. Bollocks.

Where?  They never mention the mob!
So?
Apply for the job of Embassy Spokes-writer then.

The statement release is nonetheless well stated.

I'm applying for the job as YOUR scriptwriter.  Why are you pretending that you didn't write what you wrote?  Why are you unable or unwilling to simply say you made a mistake?  It's not as if you invaded Iraq or anything.
Zionism is the National Liberation Movement of the Jewish People.