Author Topic: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo  (Read 516 times)

Offline wbcoleman

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1391
Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« on: September 11, 2012, 05:55:52 pm »


U.S. Embassy Condemns Religious Incitement
September 11, 2012

http://egypt.usembassy.gov/pr091112.html

Zionism is the National Liberation Movement of the Jewish People.

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Offline clistensprechen

  • High Lord Umpire
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *******
  • Posts: 1460
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2012, 05:58:39 pm »
Well said, actually.

 :applause:

Offline wbcoleman

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2012, 06:01:25 pm »
Well said, actually.

Do you happen to know what this is referring to?
Zionism is the National Liberation Movement of the Jewish People.

Offline Woody

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1184
  • Location: Anywhere
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #3 on: September 11, 2012, 06:01:53 pm »
That is, well, unbelievable.  Couple that with Obama refusing to meet with Netanyahu when he visits the US and you get the belief that Obama sides with the muslims and Arabs. 




To Clara
Well said Clara?  How about saying something about restraint, or  that in this country, unlike these Muslim brotherhood countries, you can speak your opinion free of government intervention or a **** beheading.


Clara, are you sure you understand what it means to support the constitution?
A reminder for kentay:
I fully support going back to ALL, that says ALL THE CLINTON TAX and spend policies that led to the economic boom in the second half of the 90's.

Offline clistensprechen

  • High Lord Umpire
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *******
  • Posts: 1460
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #4 on: September 11, 2012, 06:05:18 pm »
Well said, actually.

Do you happen to know what this is referring to?
As a general statement, it stands without needing a reference.

Offline wbcoleman

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #5 on: September 11, 2012, 06:07:06 pm »
Well said, actually.

Do you happen to know what this is referring to?
As a general statement, it stands without needing a reference.

Oh, no, no, no, there is a very specific reference.  You're saying that you fired off without knowing what it is?
Zionism is the National Liberation Movement of the Jewish People.

Offline clistensprechen

  • High Lord Umpire
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *******
  • Posts: 1460
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #6 on: September 11, 2012, 06:07:12 pm »
That is, well, unbelievable.  Couple that with Obama refusing to meet with Netanyahu when he visits the US and you get the belief that Obama sides with the muslims and Arabs. 




To Clara
Well said Clara?  How about saying something about restraint, or  that in this country, unlike these Muslim brotherhood countries, you can speak your opinion free of government intervention or a **** beheading.


Clara, are you sure you understand what it means to support the constitution?

I'm not sure that you do. In Cairo, it's the Egyptian Constitution; in the U.S. and on U. S. Embassy property, it's the U. S. Constitution.

Offline clistensprechen

  • High Lord Umpire
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *******
  • Posts: 1460
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #7 on: September 11, 2012, 06:08:27 pm »
Well said, actually.

Do you happen to know what this is referring to?
As a general statement, it stands without needing a reference.

Oh, no, no, no, there is a very specific reference.  You're saying that you fired off without knowing what it is?

I'm saying that it's a well-spoken general principle regardless of reference.  You're now attempting to assert there should be conditional. No sale.

Offline Woody

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1184
  • Location: Anywhere
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #8 on: September 11, 2012, 06:08:52 pm »
Well said, actually.

Do you happen to know what this is referring to?
As a general statement, it stands without needing a reference.


So Clara obviously feels that storming a US EMBASSY, tearing down our flag, and replacing it with a black flag because US Egyptian Christians made a movie they don't like is perfectly acceptable.


A reminder for kentay:
I fully support going back to ALL, that says ALL THE CLINTON TAX and spend policies that led to the economic boom in the second half of the 90's.

Offline wbcoleman

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #9 on: September 11, 2012, 06:09:32 pm »
That is, well, unbelievable.  Couple that with Obama refusing to meet with Netanyahu when he visits the US and you get the belief that Obama sides with the muslims and Arabs. 




To Clara
Well said Clara?  How about saying something about restraint, or  that in this country, unlike these Muslim brotherhood countries, you can speak your opinion free of government intervention or a **** beheading.


Clara, are you sure you understand what it means to support the constitution?

I'm not sure that you do. In Cairo, it's the Egyptian Constitution; in the U.S. and on U. S. Embassy property, it's the U. S. Constitution.

Now are you trying to claim that the "Egyptian Constitution" authorizes a physical mob invasion of the U.S. Embassy??
Zionism is the National Liberation Movement of the Jewish People.

Offline Woody

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1184
  • Location: Anywhere
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #10 on: September 11, 2012, 06:10:01 pm »
Well said, actually.

Do you happen to know what this is referring to?
As a general statement, it stands without needing a reference.

Oh, no, no, no, there is a very specific reference.  You're saying that you fired off without knowing what it is?

I'm saying that it's a well-spoken general principle regardless of reference.  You're now attempting to assert there should be conditional. No sale.


Bullshit.  You got caught not understanding the reference.  Typical. 
A reminder for kentay:
I fully support going back to ALL, that says ALL THE CLINTON TAX and spend policies that led to the economic boom in the second half of the 90's.

Offline wbcoleman

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #11 on: September 11, 2012, 06:10:27 pm »
Well said, actually.

Do you happen to know what this is referring to?
As a general statement, it stands without needing a reference.


So Clara obviously feels that storming a US EMBASSY, tearing down our flag, and replacing it with a black flag because US Egyptian Christians made a movie they don't like is perfectly acceptable.

I'm not sure that she knows anything about the movie.
Zionism is the National Liberation Movement of the Jewish People.

Offline wbcoleman

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #12 on: September 11, 2012, 06:11:53 pm »
Well said, actually.

Do you happen to know what this is referring to?
As a general statement, it stands without needing a reference.

Oh, no, no, no, there is a very specific reference.  You're saying that you fired off without knowing what it is?

I'm saying that it's a well-spoken general principle regardless of reference.  You're now attempting to assert there should be conditional. No sale.

In other words, you neither know nor care what the statement was talking about.  Cool!
Zionism is the National Liberation Movement of the Jewish People.

Offline Woody

  • Hypercritter
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *********
  • Posts: 1184
  • Location: Anywhere
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #13 on: September 11, 2012, 06:12:26 pm »
Well said, actually.

Do you happen to know what this is referring to?
As a general statement, it stands without needing a reference.


So Clara obviously feels that storming a US EMBASSY, tearing down our flag, and replacing it with a black flag because US Egyptian Christians made a movie they don't like is perfectly acceptable.

I'm not sure that she knows anything about the movie.


And judging from her content she does not have the urge to find out. 


A reminder for kentay:
I fully support going back to ALL, that says ALL THE CLINTON TAX and spend policies that led to the economic boom in the second half of the 90's.

Offline clistensprechen

  • High Lord Umpire
  • Imperial Varmint
  • *******
  • Posts: 1460
Re: Official Response to Attack on U.S. Embassy in Cairo
« Reply #14 on: September 11, 2012, 06:12:37 pm »
That is, well, unbelievable.  Couple that with Obama refusing to meet with Netanyahu when he visits the US and you get the belief that Obama sides with the muslims and Arabs. 




To Clara
Well said Clara?  How about saying something about restraint, or  that in this country, unlike these Muslim brotherhood countries, you can speak your opinion free of government intervention or a **** beheading.


Clara, are you sure you understand what it means to support the constitution?

I'm not sure that you do. In Cairo, it's the Egyptian Constitution; in the U.S. and on U. S. Embassy property, it's the U. S. Constitution.

Now are you trying to claim that the "Egyptian Constitution" authorizes a physical mob invasion of the U.S. Embassy??
That bunch doesn't look armed to ME.  If you see a gun that I don't, please point it out.  I just see a bunch of protesters exercising on U.S. Embassy property what the U.S. Constitution protects as Freedom of Speech.